Oscar Is a Man: Sexism and the Academy Awards

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Kenneth Grout, Owen Eagan
{"title":"Oscar Is a Man: Sexism and the Academy Awards","authors":"Kenneth Grout, Owen Eagan","doi":"10.51698/TRIPODOS.2020.48P85-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the implicit bias of the Academy Awards and Oscar’s historic lack of gender equity. While there are awards for Best Actor and Actress, a comparative analysis of these awards and the Best Picture prize reveals that a man is more than twice as likely as a woman to receive an Oscar for leading work in a Best Picture. A man is also nearly twice as likely to be nominated as a leading performer in a Best Picture winner. Supporting women in Best Pictures fare a bit better with actual trophies, but, when considering nominations, a man is still more than oneand-a-half times as likely as a woman to be nominated for a supporting performance in a Best Picture winner. This research considers these factors, identifies potential reasons for them, and draws conclusions regarding the decades of gender bias in the Academy Awards. Further, this study investigates the dissolution of the Hollywood studio system and how, though brought on in part by two of the film industry’s leading ladies, the crumbling of that system ultimately hurt the industry’s women more than its men. \nKeywords: Oscars, Academy Awards, sexism, gender inequity, Best Picture.","PeriodicalId":44263,"journal":{"name":"Tripodos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tripodos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51698/TRIPODOS.2020.48P85-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes the implicit bias of the Academy Awards and Oscar’s historic lack of gender equity. While there are awards for Best Actor and Actress, a comparative analysis of these awards and the Best Picture prize reveals that a man is more than twice as likely as a woman to receive an Oscar for leading work in a Best Picture. A man is also nearly twice as likely to be nominated as a leading performer in a Best Picture winner. Supporting women in Best Pictures fare a bit better with actual trophies, but, when considering nominations, a man is still more than oneand-a-half times as likely as a woman to be nominated for a supporting performance in a Best Picture winner. This research considers these factors, identifies potential reasons for them, and draws conclusions regarding the decades of gender bias in the Academy Awards. Further, this study investigates the dissolution of the Hollywood studio system and how, though brought on in part by two of the film industry’s leading ladies, the crumbling of that system ultimately hurt the industry’s women more than its men. Keywords: Oscars, Academy Awards, sexism, gender inequity, Best Picture.
奥斯卡是男人:性别歧视与奥斯卡金像奖
本研究分析了奥斯卡奖的隐性偏见和奥斯卡历来缺乏性别平等。虽然奥斯卡设有最佳男演员和最佳女演员奖项,但对这些奖项和最佳影片的比较分析显示,男性获得奥斯卡最佳影片的可能性是女性的两倍多。在最佳影片中,男性获得最佳男主角提名的可能性几乎是女性的两倍。在最佳影片中,女性配角在实际奖杯上的表现要好一些,但在考虑提名时,男性获得最佳影片最佳配角提名的可能性仍然是女性的1.5倍以上。这项研究考虑了这些因素,找出了它们的潜在原因,并得出了关于奥斯卡奖几十年来性别偏见的结论。此外,本研究还调查了好莱坞电影制片厂体系的解体,以及尽管这一体系的瓦解部分是由电影业的两位女主角推动的,但最终对该行业女性的伤害比对男性的伤害更大。关键词:奥斯卡,金像奖,性别歧视,性别不平等,最佳影片
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tripodos
Tripodos COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信