Is There Magic in the Text? Ritual in the Priestly Pentateuch and Other Ancient Near Eastern Literature

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Michael B. Hundley
{"title":"Is There Magic in the Text? Ritual in the Priestly Pentateuch and Other Ancient Near Eastern Literature","authors":"Michael B. Hundley","doi":"10.5508/jhs29576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Magic” is a term that continues to feature in popular and scholarly circles, yet scholars continue to disagree vehemently about its definition and utility. This article uses the various definitions of magic as lenses through which to compare the ritual texts of the Priestly Pentateuch, ancient Egypt, and ancient Mesopotamia. The results offered illumine both the texts and the scholars who interpret them. Regardless of the definition employed, the biblical and other ANE ritual texts are quite similar, leading to the conclusion that magic should not be used as a dividing line between biblical Priestly and other ANE ritual texts.","PeriodicalId":40485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hebrew Scriptures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hebrew Scriptures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5508/jhs29576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Magic” is a term that continues to feature in popular and scholarly circles, yet scholars continue to disagree vehemently about its definition and utility. This article uses the various definitions of magic as lenses through which to compare the ritual texts of the Priestly Pentateuch, ancient Egypt, and ancient Mesopotamia. The results offered illumine both the texts and the scholars who interpret them. Regardless of the definition employed, the biblical and other ANE ritual texts are quite similar, leading to the conclusion that magic should not be used as a dividing line between biblical Priestly and other ANE ritual texts.
文本中有魔力吗?祭司五经和其他古代近东文学中的仪式
“魔法”这个词在流行和学术界仍然很流行,但学者们对它的定义和用途仍然存在激烈的分歧。本文将魔法的各种定义作为镜头,通过这些镜头来比较祭司Pentateuch、古埃及和古美索不达米亚的仪式文本。研究结果为文本和解读文本的学者提供了启示。无论采用何种定义,圣经和其他ANE仪式文本都非常相似,这导致了魔法不应被用作圣经祭司和其他ANE仪式文本之间的分界线的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信