Procedural Regulation of Involuntary Hospitalization According to the Legal Order of the Czech Republic in Comparison with German Legislation

Q2 Social Sciences
P. Podrazil, Vojtěch Jirásko
{"title":"Procedural Regulation of Involuntary Hospitalization According to the Legal Order of the Czech Republic in Comparison with German Legislation","authors":"P. Podrazil, Vojtěch Jirásko","doi":"10.2478/iclr-2019-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The article focuses on the analysis of the procedural arrangements of detention proceedings in the legal order of the Czech Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany. Special attention is paid to the systematic (conceptual) setting of the functioning of procedural adjustments, whose current form is a reflection of the shift or departure from the historical law ratio legis of civil health detention. The historical ratio legis then consists in the protection of the personal freedom of the mentally ill, who were taken into the institution for the insane against their will. Thus, the links between guardianship and detention should not be neglected in the design of procedural procedures. Both procedures should be closely linked. The aim of the article is to analyze the concept of procedural modifications of detention proceedings under German and Czech legislation, also in connection with partial differences within individual procedural law institutes. Special attention is paid to the mutual relation between detention proceedings and custody proceedings.","PeriodicalId":36722,"journal":{"name":"International and Comparative Law Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"266 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International and Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The article focuses on the analysis of the procedural arrangements of detention proceedings in the legal order of the Czech Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany. Special attention is paid to the systematic (conceptual) setting of the functioning of procedural adjustments, whose current form is a reflection of the shift or departure from the historical law ratio legis of civil health detention. The historical ratio legis then consists in the protection of the personal freedom of the mentally ill, who were taken into the institution for the insane against their will. Thus, the links between guardianship and detention should not be neglected in the design of procedural procedures. Both procedures should be closely linked. The aim of the article is to analyze the concept of procedural modifications of detention proceedings under German and Czech legislation, also in connection with partial differences within individual procedural law institutes. Special attention is paid to the mutual relation between detention proceedings and custody proceedings.
捷克共和国法律秩序下非自愿住院的程序规定与德国立法的比较
本文重点分析了捷克共和国和德意志联邦共和国法律秩序中拘留诉讼的程序安排。特别关注程序调整功能的系统(概念)设置,其当前形式反映了民事卫生拘留的历史法律比例法律的转变或偏离。因此,法律的历史意义在于保护精神病患者的人身自由,他们被强行送进精神病院。因此,在设计程序程序时不应忽视监护和拘留之间的联系。这两种程序应紧密相连。本文的目的是分析德国和捷克立法下拘留程序程序性修改的概念,同时也考虑到个别程序法研究所内部的部分差异。特别注意拘留程序和拘留程序之间的相互关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信