CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH: PENERAPAN STRATEGI BELAJAR NOTE-TAKING, DISCUSSION, REFLECTIVE (NDR) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA IPA

W. B. Sabtiawan
{"title":"CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH: PENERAPAN STRATEGI BELAJAR NOTE-TAKING, DISCUSSION, REFLECTIVE (NDR) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA IPA","authors":"W. B. Sabtiawan","doi":"10.26418/JPMIPA.V9I2.26814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractOne of the difficulties of science students is learning abstract topics, such as Topic of Atom, Ion, and Molecule. This study aims to solve the difficulty using a learning strategy of Note-Taking, Discussion, Reflective (NDR). Specifically, the purpose of this study is to implement the NDR strategy for increasing students' learning outcomes. The research design is classroom action research. Methods of data collection include observation, tests, and interviews. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of Note taking-Discussion-Reflective strategy can increase the learning outcomes through the implementation of 2 research cycles where in each cycle there are three stages, namely, planning, action, and reflection. The average scores increased from cycle 1 to cycle 2 by 4.2% and a minimum score of completeness of 75 has been achieved in cycle 2. The implementation of learning was at a good and excellent level during cycles 1 and 2. In addition, there were four student's positive response to the implementation of NDR strategy, that is related to discussion activities, note-taking, learning opportunities, and working in groups.Keywords: classroom action research, NDR strategy, learning outcome. ","PeriodicalId":31449,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26418/JPMIPA.V9I2.26814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

AbstractOne of the difficulties of science students is learning abstract topics, such as Topic of Atom, Ion, and Molecule. This study aims to solve the difficulty using a learning strategy of Note-Taking, Discussion, Reflective (NDR). Specifically, the purpose of this study is to implement the NDR strategy for increasing students' learning outcomes. The research design is classroom action research. Methods of data collection include observation, tests, and interviews. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of Note taking-Discussion-Reflective strategy can increase the learning outcomes through the implementation of 2 research cycles where in each cycle there are three stages, namely, planning, action, and reflection. The average scores increased from cycle 1 to cycle 2 by 4.2% and a minimum score of completeness of 75 has been achieved in cycle 2. The implementation of learning was at a good and excellent level during cycles 1 and 2. In addition, there were four student's positive response to the implementation of NDR strategy, that is related to discussion activities, note-taking, learning opportunities, and working in groups.Keywords: classroom action research, NDR strategy, learning outcome. 
摘要理科学生的难点之一是学习抽象主题,如原子、离子和分子主题。本研究旨在使用笔记、讨论、反思(NDR)的学习策略来解决这一困难。具体而言,本研究的目的是实施NDR策略,以提高学生的学习成果。研究设计为课堂行动研究。数据收集的方法包括观察、测试和访谈。研究结果表明,实施笔记-讨论-反思策略可以通过实施两个研究周期来提高学习成果,每个周期有三个阶段,即计划、行动和反思。从第1周期到第2周期,平均得分增加了4.2%,第2周期的完整性最低得分为75。在周期1和周期2,学习的实施情况良好。此外,有四名学生对NDR策略的实施做出了积极回应,这与讨论活动、笔记、学习机会和小组工作有关。关键词:课堂行动研究,NDR策略,学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信