Reconfiguring repair: Contested politics and values of repair challenge instrumental discourses found in circular economies literature

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Duncan McLaren , Johan Niskanen , Jonas Anshelm
{"title":"Reconfiguring repair: Contested politics and values of repair challenge instrumental discourses found in circular economies literature","authors":"Duncan McLaren ,&nbsp;Johan Niskanen ,&nbsp;Jonas Anshelm","doi":"10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The treatment of ideas of repair in circular economy literature is critically reviewed, revealing instrumental understandings of repair as a tool to extend product life-spans and reduce waste. These framings are interpreted as an expression of the dominant technocratic and post-political discourses of circular economy as an intervention to sustain industrial capitalism in the face of sustainability constraints. The review contrasts these understandings of repair derived from a review of circular economy literature with richer and contested interpretations found in sociological, ethnographic and political literatures examining material repair in practice. Drawing on the emerging sociology of repair and applying more distinct concepts of restoration, remediation, reconfiguration and reconciliation derived from these literatures, the paper argues that the understandings of repair in circular economy literature are limited and restrictive, generally supporting a view of repair as sustaining, consumerist and nostalgic; and thereby overlooking potentially transformative, political and future-oriented roles for repair in a circular economy. In the restorative and remedial modes most commonly understood in the circular economy, repair is seen to enable new forms of capitalist commodification, notably of waste and domestic labour. Learning from contestation in other arenas of repair by contrast, understanding repair as encompassing ideas for reconciliation and reconfiguration, and adopting values of integrity, care and legibility, opens up repair in the circular economy to constructive critical discussion and reflection and offers new insights for policy makers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36714,"journal":{"name":"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100046","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590289X20300177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The treatment of ideas of repair in circular economy literature is critically reviewed, revealing instrumental understandings of repair as a tool to extend product life-spans and reduce waste. These framings are interpreted as an expression of the dominant technocratic and post-political discourses of circular economy as an intervention to sustain industrial capitalism in the face of sustainability constraints. The review contrasts these understandings of repair derived from a review of circular economy literature with richer and contested interpretations found in sociological, ethnographic and political literatures examining material repair in practice. Drawing on the emerging sociology of repair and applying more distinct concepts of restoration, remediation, reconfiguration and reconciliation derived from these literatures, the paper argues that the understandings of repair in circular economy literature are limited and restrictive, generally supporting a view of repair as sustaining, consumerist and nostalgic; and thereby overlooking potentially transformative, political and future-oriented roles for repair in a circular economy. In the restorative and remedial modes most commonly understood in the circular economy, repair is seen to enable new forms of capitalist commodification, notably of waste and domestic labour. Learning from contestation in other arenas of repair by contrast, understanding repair as encompassing ideas for reconciliation and reconfiguration, and adopting values of integrity, care and legibility, opens up repair in the circular economy to constructive critical discussion and reflection and offers new insights for policy makers.

重新配置修复:有争议的政治和修复的价值挑战在循环经济文献中发现的工具话语
对循环经济文献中修理思想的处理进行了批判性审查,揭示了对修理作为延长产品寿命和减少浪费的工具的工具性理解。这些框架被解释为循环经济的主导技术官僚和后政治话语的表达,作为在面临可持续性约束时维持工业资本主义的干预。这篇综述对比了这些对修复的理解,这些理解来自于对循环经济文献的回顾,而在社会学、人种学和政治文献中发现了更丰富、有争议的解释,研究了实践中的材料修复。借鉴新兴的修复社会学,并运用这些文献中更明确的修复、修复、重构和和解概念,本文认为循环经济文献中对修复的理解是有限的和限制性的,通常支持修复是持续的、消费主义的和怀旧的观点;从而忽视了在循环经济中潜在的变革性、政治性和面向未来的修复作用。在循环经济中最常见的修复和补救模式中,修复被视为实现新形式的资本主义商品化,特别是废物和家庭劳动力。相比之下,从其他修复领域的争论中学习,将修复理解为包含和解与重构的思想,并采用完整性、关怀和易读性的价值观,为循环经济中的修复开辟了建设性的批判性讨论和反思,并为政策制定者提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X
Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信