“What Makes You, You”: The Discursive Construction of the Self in US College Application Essays

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Beck, Amanda Godley
{"title":"“What Makes You, You”: The Discursive Construction of the Self in US College Application Essays","authors":"S. Beck, Amanda Godley","doi":"10.1086/725586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study draws on genre theory to analyze the linguistic and discursive presentation of the self in successful US college application essays. Research Methods: We used qualitative discourse analysis informed by the systemic functional linguistic concepts of field, tenor, and mode to analyze 20 sample application essays identified as exemplary by college admissions staff from 4 US colleges, along with essay-writing advice obtained from websites of 12 US universities. Our analysis aimed to specify (1) the characteristics of the self that are represented in successful essays and (2) how the writers linguistically and discursively construct these characteristics. Findings: Successful essays portrayed a unique and authentic self through distinctive, patterned features that spanned the three categories of field, tenor, and mode. Features related to “field” included extended metaphors representing insights gained from learning and experience, language representing niche interests, verbs suggesting learning or change, and appraisal language positioning the writer as charitable and optimistic; features related to “tenor” did not include direct address or questions but rather implicit persuasion through descriptive representation of the writer’s character; and features related to “mode” included micronarratives, extended metaphors that supported cohesion, and syntactic structures that facilitated contrast of the writer’s self before and after a significant moment of learning. Implications: As colleges move away from requiring standardized tests for admission, the importance of college application essays has increased. Our findings contribute to efforts to make successful performance of this high-stakes genre more attainable, particularly for first-generation and underrepresented students applying to college.","PeriodicalId":47629,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Education","volume":"129 1","pages":"539 - 564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study draws on genre theory to analyze the linguistic and discursive presentation of the self in successful US college application essays. Research Methods: We used qualitative discourse analysis informed by the systemic functional linguistic concepts of field, tenor, and mode to analyze 20 sample application essays identified as exemplary by college admissions staff from 4 US colleges, along with essay-writing advice obtained from websites of 12 US universities. Our analysis aimed to specify (1) the characteristics of the self that are represented in successful essays and (2) how the writers linguistically and discursively construct these characteristics. Findings: Successful essays portrayed a unique and authentic self through distinctive, patterned features that spanned the three categories of field, tenor, and mode. Features related to “field” included extended metaphors representing insights gained from learning and experience, language representing niche interests, verbs suggesting learning or change, and appraisal language positioning the writer as charitable and optimistic; features related to “tenor” did not include direct address or questions but rather implicit persuasion through descriptive representation of the writer’s character; and features related to “mode” included micronarratives, extended metaphors that supported cohesion, and syntactic structures that facilitated contrast of the writer’s self before and after a significant moment of learning. Implications: As colleges move away from requiring standardized tests for admission, the importance of college application essays has increased. Our findings contribute to efforts to make successful performance of this high-stakes genre more attainable, particularly for first-generation and underrepresented students applying to college.
“是什么造就了你,你”:美国大学申请论文中自我的话语建构
目的:本研究利用体裁理论分析成功的美国大学申请论文中自我的语言和话语表现。研究方法:我们采用定性话语分析,根据领域、旨旨和模式的系统功能语言学概念,分析了来自4所美国大学的大学招生人员确定的20篇典型申请论文样本,以及从12所美国大学的网站上获得的论文写作建议。我们的分析旨在明确(1)在成功的文章中所表现的自我特征,(2)作者如何在语言和话语上构建这些特征。发现:成功的文章通过跨越领域、男高音和模式三类的独特、模式特征描绘了一个独特而真实的自我。与“领域”相关的特征包括代表从学习和经验中获得的见解的扩展隐喻,代表利基兴趣的语言,暗示学习或变化的动词,以及将作者定位为慈善和乐观的评价语言;与“男高音”相关的特征不包括直接的称呼或问题,而是通过对作者性格的描述来含蓄地说服;与“模式”相关的特征包括微叙事,支持衔接的扩展隐喻,以及促进作者在重要学习时刻前后自我对比的句法结构。启示:随着大学不再要求标准化的入学考试,大学申请论文的重要性增加了。我们的研究结果有助于使这种高风险类型的成功表现更容易实现,特别是对于申请大学的第一代和代表性不足的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Education
American Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Founded as School Review in 1893, the American Journal of Education acquired its present name in November 1979. The Journal seeks to bridge and integrate the intellectual, methodological, and substantive diversity of educational scholarship, and to encourage a vigorous dialogue between educational scholars and practitioners. To achieve that goal, papers are published that present research, theoretical statements, philosophical arguments, critical syntheses of a field of educational inquiry, and integrations of educational scholarship, policy, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信