Emotive Figures as "Shown" Emotion in Italian Post-Unification Conduct Books (1860-1900)

IF 0.9 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Informal Logic Pub Date : 2019-12-16 DOI:10.22329/il.v39i4.6033

Annick Paternoster

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Within a digital corpus of 20 Italian post-unification conduct books (1860 to 1900), UAM CorpusTool is used to perform a manual annotation of 13 emotive rhetorical figures as indices of “shown” emotion (émotion montrée, Micheli 2014). The analysis consists in two text mining tasks: classification, which identifies emotive figures using the 13 categories, and clustering, which identifies groups, i.e. clusters where emotive figures co-occur. Emotive clusters mainly discuss diligence and parsimony—personal values linked to self-improvement for which reader agreement is not taken for granted. In this corpus they function as “moving” values, that is, values acting recurrently as contexts for “argued” emotion (émotion étayée, Micheli 2014).

查看原文本刊更多论文

意大利统一后行为书籍中的情感人物作为“显示”的情感（1860-1900）

在20本意大利统一后行为书籍（1860年至1900年）的数字语料库中，UAM语料库工具用于对13个情绪修辞数字进行手动注释，作为“显示”情绪的索引（émotion montrée，Micheli 2014）。该分析包括两个文本挖掘任务：分类，使用13个类别识别情绪图形；聚类，识别组，即情绪图形共同出现的聚类。情感集群主要讨论勤奋和节俭——与自我提升相关的个人价值观，读者对此并不认同。在这个语料库中，它们起着“移动”价值观的作用，也就是说，价值观反复充当“争论”情绪的语境（émotionétayée，Micheli 2014）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Informal Logic PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Informal Logic publishes articles that advance the dialectic in reasoning and argumentation theory and practice. Primary criteria for the acceptance of articles with a theoretical focus or interest are: (1) the article advances the dialectic or constitutes an interesting comment on it: it presents a cogent argument, objection, interpretation or position that is an advance in relation to the background of issues and controversies on the topic; or it casts the issue addressed in a new and worthwhile light; and (2) the article makes explicit reference to the pertinent literature on its topic, and it discharges the burden of proof imposed by that scholarship. Primary criteria for acceptance of articles devoted to the teaching of informal logic, critical thinking or argumentation include: originality; utility; timeliness; and evidence of the effectiveness of the methods, materials, technologies, etc., proposed. The standard criteria for scholarly publication—topical fit with the subjects covered in the journal; adequacy of coverage to the issue addressed; clarity, organization and literateness of the prose; conceptual clarity and cogency of argumentation—apply ceteris paribus to the selection of all articles, notes and reviews.