Does Your Article Need A Methods Or Methodology Sub-Section?

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
T. Slater
{"title":"Does Your Article Need A Methods Or Methodology Sub-Section?","authors":"T. Slater","doi":"10.19030/JAESE.V5I2.10220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the process of writing a discipline-based science education research article for the Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, authors are faced with the question of titling each of the article’s subjections. Some editors and authors advocate a METHODS section whereas others advocate for a METHODOLOGY(IES) section.  What do we currently prefer in JAESE?  The answer is an unsatisfying, “it depends.”  The vast majority of papers in the JAESE Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education use a traditional METHODS section because most—but certainly not all—papers to date describe studies in which the method of inquiry is based on a balance of pragmatism, cost, usefulness, and actionable information.  This is in contrast to a METHODOLOGY section, which takes time to argue for why a particular approach will be most fruitful for the question at hand.  A robust mix of both are vitally important across the broader discipline-based science education researcher community. ","PeriodicalId":52014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astronomy and Earth Sciences Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astronomy and Earth Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/JAESE.V5I2.10220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the process of writing a discipline-based science education research article for the Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, authors are faced with the question of titling each of the article’s subjections. Some editors and authors advocate a METHODS section whereas others advocate for a METHODOLOGY(IES) section.  What do we currently prefer in JAESE?  The answer is an unsatisfying, “it depends.”  The vast majority of papers in the JAESE Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education use a traditional METHODS section because most—but certainly not all—papers to date describe studies in which the method of inquiry is based on a balance of pragmatism, cost, usefulness, and actionable information.  This is in contrast to a METHODOLOGY section, which takes time to argue for why a particular approach will be most fruitful for the question at hand.  A robust mix of both are vitally important across the broader discipline-based science education researcher community. 
你的文章需要一个方法或方法论子节吗?
在为《天文与地球科学教育杂志》撰写学科科学教育研究文章的过程中,作者面临着文章各学科标题的问题。一些编辑和作者支持METHODS部分,而另一些则支持方法论(IES)部分。我们目前更喜欢JAESE的什么?答案是一个令人不满意的“视情况而定”。JAESE天文学与地球科学教育期刊上的绝大多数论文都使用传统的方法部分,因为迄今为止大多数(但肯定不是全部)论文描述的研究中,探究方法是基于实用主义、成本、有用性和可操作信息的平衡。这与方法论部分形成对比,方法论部分需要时间来论证为什么特定的方法对手头的问题最有效。在更广泛的以学科为基础的科学教育研究者群体中,两者的有力结合是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Astronomy and Earth Sciences Education
Journal of Astronomy and Earth Sciences Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
1
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信