Radiation Dose And Image Quality In Various Examinations And Imaging Modes Of Dentomaxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Q3 Health Professions
M. Toossi, Navid Zafari Ghadim, Elham Dolat, H. Azimian, M. S. Moghadam
{"title":"Radiation Dose And Image Quality In Various Examinations And Imaging Modes Of Dentomaxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography","authors":"M. Toossi, Navid Zafari Ghadim, Elham Dolat, H. Azimian, M. S. Moghadam","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2021.56040.1932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIntroduction:Cone-beam computed tomography is used for specialized imaging of dental and maxillofacial structures. CBCTs capabilities and facilities for dental and maxillofacial imaging have resulted in their increasing clinical use. Although the dose of CBCT tests is low, its widespread use increases the cumulative dose. This study was conducted to evaluate head and neck effective dose and image quality in different organs for various exposure techniques in CBCT imaging.Materials and Methods:This study was performed on various CBCT imaging examinations. Head and neck parts of anthropomorphic male Rando® Alderson Phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters were used for organ dosimetry. Contrast to noise ratio and signal to noise ratio were evaluated for image quality assessments. For this purpose, the region of the tooth and soft tissue images were randomly used as the basis. Results: Mean effective dose for face and paranasal sinuses imaging in three modes ( standard, low-dose, ultra-low dose), temporomandibular imaging in two modes(standard & low dose), and dental imaging in implant and endo imaging modes was equal to 382.17, 193.97, 79.96, 262.6, 135.67, 53.93, 682.83, 335.75, 184.18, and 234.57 μSv, respectively. Signal -to -noise ratio (SNR) for the above-mentioned procedures was equal to 6.04, 5.73, 3.71, 6.3, 6.00, 4.08, 14.2, 12.3, 7.51, and 6.97, respectively.Conclusion: The present study showed, when low dose and ultra-low-dose modes are chosen, the patient's dose will be severely reduced in most CBCT procedures. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and SNR will diminish too, but they are sufficient for some diagnostic purposes.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2021.56040.1932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction:Cone-beam computed tomography is used for specialized imaging of dental and maxillofacial structures. CBCTs capabilities and facilities for dental and maxillofacial imaging have resulted in their increasing clinical use. Although the dose of CBCT tests is low, its widespread use increases the cumulative dose. This study was conducted to evaluate head and neck effective dose and image quality in different organs for various exposure techniques in CBCT imaging.Materials and Methods:This study was performed on various CBCT imaging examinations. Head and neck parts of anthropomorphic male Rando® Alderson Phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters were used for organ dosimetry. Contrast to noise ratio and signal to noise ratio were evaluated for image quality assessments. For this purpose, the region of the tooth and soft tissue images were randomly used as the basis. Results: Mean effective dose for face and paranasal sinuses imaging in three modes ( standard, low-dose, ultra-low dose), temporomandibular imaging in two modes(standard & low dose), and dental imaging in implant and endo imaging modes was equal to 382.17, 193.97, 79.96, 262.6, 135.67, 53.93, 682.83, 335.75, 184.18, and 234.57 μSv, respectively. Signal -to -noise ratio (SNR) for the above-mentioned procedures was equal to 6.04, 5.73, 3.71, 6.3, 6.00, 4.08, 14.2, 12.3, 7.51, and 6.97, respectively.Conclusion: The present study showed, when low dose and ultra-low-dose modes are chosen, the patient's dose will be severely reduced in most CBCT procedures. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and SNR will diminish too, but they are sufficient for some diagnostic purposes.
牙颌面锥束计算机断层扫描不同检查和成像方式的辐射剂量和图像质量
摘要简介:锥束计算机断层扫描是一种用于口腔和颌面结构的专业成像技术。cbct在牙科和颌面成像方面的能力和设施导致其临床应用越来越多。虽然CBCT试验的剂量很低,但它的广泛使用增加了累积剂量。本研究旨在评估不同CBCT成像方式下头颈部不同器官的有效剂量和图像质量。材料和方法:本研究通过多种CBCT影像学检查进行。器官剂量测定采用拟人男性Rando®Alderson Phantom和热释光剂量计进行。对比噪声比和信噪比进行图像质量评价。为此,我们随机选取牙齿区域和软组织图像作为基础。结果:面部和鼻窦三种成像模式(标准、低剂量、超低剂量)、颞下颌两种成像模式(标准、低剂量)、口腔种植体和内腔成像模式的平均有效剂量分别为382.17、193.97、79.96、262.6、135.67、53.93、682.83、335.75、184.18、234.57 μSv。上述程序的信噪比分别为6.04、5.73、3.71、6.3、6.00、4.08、14.2、12.3、7.51、6.97。结论:本研究显示,在大多数CBCT程序中,当选择低剂量和超低剂量模式时,患者的剂量会严重减少。噪比(CNR)和信噪比(SNR)也会降低,但它们对于某些诊断目的已经足够了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信