Test-Wiseness and Multiple-Choice Accounting Questions: Implications for Instructors

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
C. Bailey, J. Briggs, James H. Irving
{"title":"Test-Wiseness and Multiple-Choice Accounting Questions: Implications for Instructors","authors":"C. Bailey, J. Briggs, James H. Irving","doi":"10.2308/issues-2021-025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines “test-wiseness” rules-of-thumb accounting students may use when they cannot answer a multiple-choice question. The effectiveness of the rules is poorly understood, but they rely largely on preventable flaws in question design. After identifying eleven relevant rules, we had graduate research assistants employ the rules on unfamiliar material, to test whether the rules can be effective when used by capable students who have not studied the material. Three of the rules demonstrate positive results, and participants are able to recognize the more valuable ones. Additionally, we survey accounting majors at two universities to assess general familiarity and belief in the rules. We find that they have well-formed ideas of the relative usefulness, which are consistent between universities. The results provide some insights into the issues question writers should consider, so as to avoid vulnerability to test-wiseness or even turn the rules to their advantage when composing questions.","PeriodicalId":46324,"journal":{"name":"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2021-025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examines “test-wiseness” rules-of-thumb accounting students may use when they cannot answer a multiple-choice question. The effectiveness of the rules is poorly understood, but they rely largely on preventable flaws in question design. After identifying eleven relevant rules, we had graduate research assistants employ the rules on unfamiliar material, to test whether the rules can be effective when used by capable students who have not studied the material. Three of the rules demonstrate positive results, and participants are able to recognize the more valuable ones. Additionally, we survey accounting majors at two universities to assess general familiarity and belief in the rules. We find that they have well-formed ideas of the relative usefulness, which are consistent between universities. The results provide some insights into the issues question writers should consider, so as to avoid vulnerability to test-wiseness or even turn the rules to their advantage when composing questions.
测试意愿与会计多选题对教师的启示
这项研究考察了会计专业学生在无法回答多项选择题时可能使用的“测试明智性”经验法则。人们对这些规则的有效性知之甚少,但它们在很大程度上依赖于问题设计中可预防的缺陷。在确定了11条相关规则后,我们让研究生研究助理在不熟悉的材料上使用这些规则,以测试这些规则在没有学习过材料的有能力的学生使用时是否有效。其中三条规则展示了积极的结果,参与者能够识别出更有价值的结果。此外,我们调查了两所大学的会计专业学生,以评估他们对规则的普遍熟悉程度和信念。我们发现,他们在相对有用性方面形成了良好的观念,这在大学之间是一致的。研究结果为问题作者应该考虑的问题提供了一些见解,以避免在撰写问题时容易测试是否明智,甚至使规则对他们有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The mission of Issues in Accounting Education is to publish research, commentaries, instructional resources, and book reviews that assist accounting faculty in teaching and that address important issues in accounting education. The journal will consist of two major sections, “Research and Commentary” and “Instructional Resources”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信