Laser safety eyewear.

Deepthi Malayanur, V. Mysore
{"title":"Laser safety eyewear.","authors":"Deepthi Malayanur, V. Mysore","doi":"10.25259/csdm_15_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In spite of repeated warnings about laser safety practices, as well as the availability of laser safety eyewear (LSE), eye injuries continue to occur during use of surgical lasers, as discussed in the Clinical Perspective, \"Laser Energy and Its Dangers to Eyes,\" preceding this Evaluation. We evaluated 48 models of LSE, including goggles, spectacles, and wraps, from 11 manufacturers. The evaluated models are designed with absorptive lenses that provide protection from CO2 (carbon dioxide), Nd:YAG (neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet), and 532 (frequency-doubled Nd:YAG) surgical laser wavelengths; several models provide multiwavelength protection. (Refer to ECRI's Product Comparison System report on LSE for specifications of other models.) Although most of the evaluated models can adequately protect users from laser energy--provided that the eyewear is used--many models of LSE, especially goggles, are designed with little regard for the needs of actual use (e.g., adequate labeling, no alteration of color perception, sufficient field of vision [FOV], comfort). Because these factors can discourage people from using LSE, we encourage manufacturers to develop new and improved models that will be worn. We based our ratings primarily on the laser protection provided by the optical density (OD) of the lenses; we acknowledge the contribution of Montana Laser Optics Inc., of Bozeman, Montana, in performing our OD testing. We also considered actual-use factors, such as those mentioned above, to be significant. Among the models rated Acceptable is one whose labeled OD is lower than the level we determined to be adequate for use during most laser surgery; however, this model offers protection under specific conditions of use (e.g., for use by spectators some distance from the surgical site, for use during endoscopic procedures) that should be determined by the laser safety officer (LSO). LSE that would put the wearer at risk are rated Unacceptable (e.g., some models are not properly or clearly labeled, have measured ODs that are not adequate for protection, or significantly restrict the wearer's FOV); also, LSE with side shields that do not offer adequate protection from diffuse laser energy are rated Unacceptable. Those models that offer adequate protection for surgical applications, but whose measured OD is less than their labeled OD, are rated Acceptable--Not Recommended; if the discrepancy is great, they are rated Unacceptable. Those models whose labels were removed during cleaning are rated Conditionally Acceptable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)","PeriodicalId":77154,"journal":{"name":"Health devices","volume":"22 4 1","pages":"159-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/csdm_15_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In spite of repeated warnings about laser safety practices, as well as the availability of laser safety eyewear (LSE), eye injuries continue to occur during use of surgical lasers, as discussed in the Clinical Perspective, "Laser Energy and Its Dangers to Eyes," preceding this Evaluation. We evaluated 48 models of LSE, including goggles, spectacles, and wraps, from 11 manufacturers. The evaluated models are designed with absorptive lenses that provide protection from CO2 (carbon dioxide), Nd:YAG (neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet), and 532 (frequency-doubled Nd:YAG) surgical laser wavelengths; several models provide multiwavelength protection. (Refer to ECRI's Product Comparison System report on LSE for specifications of other models.) Although most of the evaluated models can adequately protect users from laser energy--provided that the eyewear is used--many models of LSE, especially goggles, are designed with little regard for the needs of actual use (e.g., adequate labeling, no alteration of color perception, sufficient field of vision [FOV], comfort). Because these factors can discourage people from using LSE, we encourage manufacturers to develop new and improved models that will be worn. We based our ratings primarily on the laser protection provided by the optical density (OD) of the lenses; we acknowledge the contribution of Montana Laser Optics Inc., of Bozeman, Montana, in performing our OD testing. We also considered actual-use factors, such as those mentioned above, to be significant. Among the models rated Acceptable is one whose labeled OD is lower than the level we determined to be adequate for use during most laser surgery; however, this model offers protection under specific conditions of use (e.g., for use by spectators some distance from the surgical site, for use during endoscopic procedures) that should be determined by the laser safety officer (LSO). LSE that would put the wearer at risk are rated Unacceptable (e.g., some models are not properly or clearly labeled, have measured ODs that are not adequate for protection, or significantly restrict the wearer's FOV); also, LSE with side shields that do not offer adequate protection from diffuse laser energy are rated Unacceptable. Those models that offer adequate protection for surgical applications, but whose measured OD is less than their labeled OD, are rated Acceptable--Not Recommended; if the discrepancy is great, they are rated Unacceptable. Those models whose labels were removed during cleaning are rated Conditionally Acceptable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
激光安全眼镜。
尽管关于激光安全操作的一再警告,以及激光安全眼镜(LSE)的可用性,但在手术激光使用过程中,眼睛受伤仍然发生,正如在本评估之前的临床观点“激光能量及其对眼睛的危险”中所讨论的那样。我们评估了来自11家制造商的48种LSE型号,包括护目镜、眼镜和贴膜。评估的模型设计有吸收透镜,提供对CO2(二氧化碳),Nd:YAG(钕:钇-铝-石榴石)和532(倍频Nd:YAG)手术激光波长的保护;几种型号提供多波长保护。(其他型号规格参考ECRI在LSE上的产品比较系统报告。)虽然大多数被评估的型号可以充分保护用户免受激光能量的伤害——只要使用眼镜——但许多LSE型号,特别是护目镜,在设计时很少考虑实际使用的需要(例如,足够的标签,不改变颜色感知,足够的视野[FOV],舒适度)。因为这些因素会阻碍人们使用LSE,所以我们鼓励制造商开发新的和改进的型号。我们的评级主要基于透镜的光密度(OD)提供的激光保护;我们感谢蒙大拿州波兹曼的蒙大拿激光光学公司在执行我们的OD测试方面的贡献。我们还考虑了实际使用因素,如上面提到的那些,是重要的。在被评为可接受的模型中,标记的OD低于我们确定的在大多数激光手术中使用的足够水平的模型;然而,该模型在特定的使用条件下提供保护(例如,在距离手术部位一定距离的观众使用,在内窥镜手术期间使用),应由激光安全官员(LSO)确定。将佩戴者置于危险中的LSE被评为不可接受(例如,某些型号没有正确或清楚地标记,测量的ODs不足以提供保护,或严重限制佩戴者的视野);此外,具有侧屏蔽的LSE不能提供足够的保护以防止漫射激光能量被评为不可接受。那些模型,提供足够的保护手术应用,但其测量外径小于其标签外径,被评为可接受-不推荐;如果差异很大,则被评为不可接受。在清洗过程中标签被移除的型号被评为“有条件可接受”。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信