A survey on supply chain ontologies

IF 1.3 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nikoletta E. Samaridi, N. Karanikolas, M. Papoutsidakis, E. Papakitsos, Christos E. Papakitsos
{"title":"A survey on supply chain ontologies","authors":"Nikoletta E. Samaridi, N. Karanikolas, M. Papoutsidakis, E. Papakitsos, Christos E. Papakitsos","doi":"10.4995/ijpme.2023.18702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, the business area cannot be sustainable and efficient without the presence of the Supply Chain. However, Supply Chain Management is by no means an easy task. Experts, in their effort to achieve the most efficient Supply Chain Management, have turned their attention to the management of knowledge related to supply chains. Thus, they model the concepts and the semantic relationships between them in Supply Chain Networks and create conceptual models and ontologies. In this paper, a survey of the existing ontologies in this field is carried out, with the aim of creating a new ontology of the Supply Chain that will unify its structural elements and lead to the integration of all supply systems. For this purpose, 22 ontological models from different supply systems, from over 90 sources, have been collected, briefly presented and commented on. These models, although being an intersection in the effort to model business operations and delineate a good basis for businesses to engage in Logistics processes, they lack an adequate formulation of appropriate semantics and terminology to describe all the different functions of the Supply Chain. Consequently, this lack inevitably leads to incompatible interpretations and uses of the knowledge that results from intercompany transactions.","PeriodicalId":41823,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Management and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Management and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme.2023.18702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, the business area cannot be sustainable and efficient without the presence of the Supply Chain. However, Supply Chain Management is by no means an easy task. Experts, in their effort to achieve the most efficient Supply Chain Management, have turned their attention to the management of knowledge related to supply chains. Thus, they model the concepts and the semantic relationships between them in Supply Chain Networks and create conceptual models and ontologies. In this paper, a survey of the existing ontologies in this field is carried out, with the aim of creating a new ontology of the Supply Chain that will unify its structural elements and lead to the integration of all supply systems. For this purpose, 22 ontological models from different supply systems, from over 90 sources, have been collected, briefly presented and commented on. These models, although being an intersection in the effort to model business operations and delineate a good basis for businesses to engage in Logistics processes, they lack an adequate formulation of appropriate semantics and terminology to describe all the different functions of the Supply Chain. Consequently, this lack inevitably leads to incompatible interpretations and uses of the knowledge that results from intercompany transactions.
供应链本体论研究综述
如今,如果没有供应链的存在,商业领域就无法持续和高效。然而,供应链管理绝不是一件容易的事。为了实现最有效的供应链管理,专家们将注意力转向了与供应链相关的知识管理。因此,他们在供应链网络中对概念和它们之间的语义关系进行建模,并创建概念模型和本体。本文对该领域的现有本体进行了调查,旨在创建一个新的供应链本体,该本体将统一其结构元素并导致所有供应系统的集成。为此目的,从90多个来源收集、简要介绍和评论了来自不同供应系统的22个本体论模型。尽管这些模型是为业务操作建模和为企业参与物流流程描绘良好基础的努力中的一个交叉点,但它们缺乏适当的语义和术语的充分表述来描述供应链的所有不同功能。因此,这种缺乏不可避免地导致对公司内部交易产生的知识的不相容的解释和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信