Parental well-being: Russian women's view

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
N. Tonkikh
{"title":"Parental well-being: Russian women's view","authors":"N. Tonkikh","doi":"10.19181/population.2022.25.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of a qualitative sociological study using the author's technology in order to conceptualize the phenomenon of parental well-being. The methodology of the study is based on the generalization of the theoretical provisions of parenthood and family well-being. It is concluded that parental well-being as a factor of demographic processes has not been studied enough, the concept of parental well-being has vague contours, there is no detailed formulation of its content and basic elements. In May — July 2022, on the results of an online survey there were collected and processed empirical data based on the responses of women (N = 335) to the open question \"What do you associate with the concept of \"parental well-being\"? Write one or two phrases/sentences.\" The respondents' responses were processed using semantic content analysis. The word \"happiness\" was used in 18.8% of the responses received. Thematic coding was applied, individual and collective trajectories of meanings were identified. There are 10 collective trajectories combined in the author's system of markers of parental well-being. The frequency of markers mentioning in women's responses was calculated, that made it possible to identify key, basic markers: relationships with children (32.5%); well-being and success of children (29.6%); health (28.4%); security: income, work, housing (19.1%); emotional state of parents (10.4%); time (8.4%). Childless women were 3 times less likely to mention the topic \"Well-being and success of children\", but they are much more likely to associate parental well-being with finances and the ability to provide everything necessary for children. It makes sense to take these results into account when forming programs to popularize parenthood among young people. The author has formulated a \"working\" definition of the concept of parental well-being, substantiated the need for further research to clarify it on the basis of surveys of men using a similar technology. The practical value of the system of basic markers of parental well-being lies in the possibilities of its application for further development of the sample survey program \"Digitalization of employment, fertility and parental well-being\".","PeriodicalId":47095,"journal":{"name":"Population","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2022.25.4.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article presents the results of a qualitative sociological study using the author's technology in order to conceptualize the phenomenon of parental well-being. The methodology of the study is based on the generalization of the theoretical provisions of parenthood and family well-being. It is concluded that parental well-being as a factor of demographic processes has not been studied enough, the concept of parental well-being has vague contours, there is no detailed formulation of its content and basic elements. In May — July 2022, on the results of an online survey there were collected and processed empirical data based on the responses of women (N = 335) to the open question "What do you associate with the concept of "parental well-being"? Write one or two phrases/sentences." The respondents' responses were processed using semantic content analysis. The word "happiness" was used in 18.8% of the responses received. Thematic coding was applied, individual and collective trajectories of meanings were identified. There are 10 collective trajectories combined in the author's system of markers of parental well-being. The frequency of markers mentioning in women's responses was calculated, that made it possible to identify key, basic markers: relationships with children (32.5%); well-being and success of children (29.6%); health (28.4%); security: income, work, housing (19.1%); emotional state of parents (10.4%); time (8.4%). Childless women were 3 times less likely to mention the topic "Well-being and success of children", but they are much more likely to associate parental well-being with finances and the ability to provide everything necessary for children. It makes sense to take these results into account when forming programs to popularize parenthood among young people. The author has formulated a "working" definition of the concept of parental well-being, substantiated the need for further research to clarify it on the basis of surveys of men using a similar technology. The practical value of the system of basic markers of parental well-being lies in the possibilities of its application for further development of the sample survey program "Digitalization of employment, fertility and parental well-being".
父母幸福:俄罗斯妇女的观点
本文介绍了一项定性社会学研究的结果,该研究使用作者的技术来概念化父母幸福感的现象。这项研究的方法是基于对为人父母和家庭幸福的理论规定的概括。结论是,对父母幸福感作为人口统计过程的一个因素的研究还不够,父母幸福感的概念轮廓模糊,其内容和基本要素没有详细的表述。2022年5月至7月,根据一项在线调查的结果,收集并处理了基于女性(N=335)对公开问题“你认为“父母幸福感”的概念是什么?写一两个短语/句子”的回答的经验数据。受访者的回答使用语义内容分析进行了处理。18.8%的回复中使用了“幸福”一词。应用主题编码,识别了意义的个体和集体轨迹。在作者的父母幸福感标记系统中,共有10条集体轨迹。计算了女性回答中提到的标记的频率,这使得确定关键的基本标记成为可能:与儿童的关系(32.5%);儿童的幸福感和成功感(29.6%);健康(28.4%);保障:收入、工作、住房(19.1%);父母情绪状态(10.4%);没有孩子的女性提到“孩子的幸福和成功”这个话题的可能性要低3倍,但她们更可能将父母的幸福感与经济状况和为孩子提供一切必要的能力联系起来。在制定在年轻人中普及为人父母的计划时,考虑到这些结果是有意义的。作者对父母幸福感的概念提出了一个“有效”的定义,证实了需要进一步研究,以在使用类似技术对男性进行调查的基础上澄清这一概念。父母幸福感基本标志体系的实际价值在于其应用于进一步发展“就业、生育和父母幸福感数字化”抽样调查方案的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population
Population DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信