Creative Achievement of Eminent Scientists in Tang and Song Dynasties of China: A Historiometric Study

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Xinfa Yi, Peiling Hong, Pengfei Chen, Xinyang Bai, Sijia Li, Senqing Qi, M. Runco
{"title":"Creative Achievement of Eminent Scientists in Tang and Song Dynasties of China: A Historiometric Study","authors":"Xinfa Yi, Peiling Hong, Pengfei Chen, Xinyang Bai, Sijia Li, Senqing Qi, M. Runco","doi":"10.1002/jocb.607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The creative achievements of eminent genius in Chinese history are of enormous interest. There is, however, uncertainty about the accurate measurement of eminence and creativity. The most tenable measurement approach is historiometric. Nearly all historiometric research on eminence and creative achievement has involved Western samples. The present investigation used historiometry to test two hypotheses about creative achievement with Eastern samples. These point to developmental adversity (DA) and the “madness‐to‐genius link” thought to facilitate unusual cognitive patterns and thus a creative capacity. Here, historiometric methods were applied to a sample of 55 eminent scientists in the Chinese Tang and Song dynasties. DA and mental illness did not significantly predict Chinese scientists' creative outcomes. Other diversifying experiences, such as religious beliefs, migration, and role model mentors, had a positive relationship with eminence and creative achievement. The Tang and Song dynasties had different religious structures, so religion had a different impact on the creative achievements of scientists. In the Tang Dynasty, religion could positively predict the creative achievements of scientists, while in the Song Dynasty it could not. These findings warrant further research using other eminent creators in Chinese history.","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.607","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The creative achievements of eminent genius in Chinese history are of enormous interest. There is, however, uncertainty about the accurate measurement of eminence and creativity. The most tenable measurement approach is historiometric. Nearly all historiometric research on eminence and creative achievement has involved Western samples. The present investigation used historiometry to test two hypotheses about creative achievement with Eastern samples. These point to developmental adversity (DA) and the “madness‐to‐genius link” thought to facilitate unusual cognitive patterns and thus a creative capacity. Here, historiometric methods were applied to a sample of 55 eminent scientists in the Chinese Tang and Song dynasties. DA and mental illness did not significantly predict Chinese scientists' creative outcomes. Other diversifying experiences, such as religious beliefs, migration, and role model mentors, had a positive relationship with eminence and creative achievement. The Tang and Song dynasties had different religious structures, so religion had a different impact on the creative achievements of scientists. In the Tang Dynasty, religion could positively predict the creative achievements of scientists, while in the Song Dynasty it could not. These findings warrant further research using other eminent creators in Chinese history.
中国唐宋杰出科学家的创新成就——历史计量学研究
中国历史上杰出天才的创作成就引起了极大的兴趣。然而,对卓越和创造力的准确衡量存在不确定性。最可行的测量方法是历史度量法。几乎所有关于卓越和创造性成就的历史计量学研究都涉及西方样本。本研究使用历史计量学对东方样本中关于创造性成就的两个假设进行了检验。这些都指向发展逆境(DA)和“疯狂与天才的联系”,认为这有助于促进不同寻常的认知模式,从而提高创造力。在这里,历史计量方法被应用于55名中国唐朝和宋代著名科学家的样本。DA和精神疾病并不能显著预测中国科学家的创新成果。其他多样化的经历,如宗教信仰、移民和榜样导师,与卓越和创造性成就有着积极的关系。唐、宋两代的宗教结构不同,宗教对科学家的创作成就有着不同的影响。在唐代,宗教可以肯定地预测科学家的创造性成就,而在宋代则不能。这些发现值得利用中国历史上其他杰出的创造者进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信