Coleridge and the Idea of History

IF 0.3 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Romanticism Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.3366/rom.2023.0579
Tom Duggett
{"title":"Coleridge and the Idea of History","authors":"Tom Duggett","doi":"10.3366/rom.2023.0579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coleridge spoke in September 1831 of his wish ‘to make History scientific, and Science historical – to take from History its accidentality – and from Science its fatalism’. This self-description raises the question of Coleridge's status as a ‘scientific historian’. Is Coleridge a prototype for R.G. Collingwood's definition of this mode of scientific study, of solving problems, not surveying periods, putting questions to ‘the world of ideas’ which historical evidence ‘creates in the present’? Is Coleridge, alternatively, the pattern of Collingwood's deluded ‘pigeon-holer’, arranging the past ‘in a single scheme’ and bragging about ‘raising history to the rank of a science’? Re-reading Coleridge with Collingwood and twenty-first century accounts of methodological idealism and of ‘presence’, I trace a distinct historical interest back through Church and State (1829), The Friend (1818) and Biographia Literaria (1817) to the ‘Comparison’ essays of 1802.","PeriodicalId":42939,"journal":{"name":"Romanticism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/rom.2023.0579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coleridge spoke in September 1831 of his wish ‘to make History scientific, and Science historical – to take from History its accidentality – and from Science its fatalism’. This self-description raises the question of Coleridge's status as a ‘scientific historian’. Is Coleridge a prototype for R.G. Collingwood's definition of this mode of scientific study, of solving problems, not surveying periods, putting questions to ‘the world of ideas’ which historical evidence ‘creates in the present’? Is Coleridge, alternatively, the pattern of Collingwood's deluded ‘pigeon-holer’, arranging the past ‘in a single scheme’ and bragging about ‘raising history to the rank of a science’? Re-reading Coleridge with Collingwood and twenty-first century accounts of methodological idealism and of ‘presence’, I trace a distinct historical interest back through Church and State (1829), The Friend (1818) and Biographia Literaria (1817) to the ‘Comparison’ essays of 1802.
《柯勒律治与历史观
柯勒律治在1831年9月谈到了他的愿望“使历史科学化,使科学科学化——从历史中取其偶然性,从科学中取其宿命论”。这种自我描述提出了柯勒律治作为“科学历史学家”的地位问题。柯勒律治是R.G.科林伍德对这种科学研究模式的定义的原型吗?这种模式是解决问题,而不是考察时期,向历史证据“在当下创造”的“思想世界”提出问题。另一方面,柯勒律治是柯林伍德那种被欺骗的“鸽子窝”,把过去“安排在一个单一的计划中”,并吹嘘“把历史提升到科学的地位”的模式吗?重读柯勒律治和科林伍德,以及21世纪关于方法论唯心主义和“存在”的论述,我从《教会与国家》(1829年)、《朋友》(1818年)和《文学传记》(1817年)追溯到1802年的《比较》论文,对历史产生了独特的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Romanticism
Romanticism LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The most distinguished scholarly journal of its kind edited and published in Britain, Romanticism offers a forum for the flourishing diversity of Romantic studies today. Focusing on the period 1750-1850, it publishes critical, historical, textual and bibliographical essays prepared to the highest scholarly standards, reflecting the full range of current methodological and theoretical debate. With an extensive reviews section, Romanticism constitutes a vital international arena for scholarly debate in this liveliest field of literary studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信