A Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Process-Based Digitalisation Opportunity and Priority Assessment (DOPA)

Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4018/ijban.298018
Nihan Yıldırım, Birden Tuluğ Siyahi, Oğuz Özbek, Imran Ahioğlu, Almira Selin Kahya
{"title":"A Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Process-Based Digitalisation Opportunity and Priority Assessment (DOPA)","authors":"Nihan Yıldırım, Birden Tuluğ Siyahi, Oğuz Özbek, Imran Ahioğlu, Almira Selin Kahya","doi":"10.4018/ijban.298018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the introduction of Industry 4.0 and supporting technologies, both service and manufacturing companies faced external and internal pressure for \"going digital\". In many cases, companies cannot decide on the digitalisation initiative due to preliminary groundwork to justify the required investment. For digitalisation priority setting under uncertain benefits, available digital technology selection methods lack the focus on process needs and do not fully utilise quality management tools in the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework. In this context, this study aims to propose a novel, context-independent, and process-based Digital Opportunity Priority Assessment (DOPA) methodology. The proposed approach utilizes critical to quality measures (CTQs), the causes with potential adversary effects as alternatives, and the importance, frequency, and digital control level of CTQs as the criteria in TOPSIS. AHP and Fuzzy AHP validate CTQ importance criteria. The study also presents a real industry application to validate the proposed model.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijban.298018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the introduction of Industry 4.0 and supporting technologies, both service and manufacturing companies faced external and internal pressure for "going digital". In many cases, companies cannot decide on the digitalisation initiative due to preliminary groundwork to justify the required investment. For digitalisation priority setting under uncertain benefits, available digital technology selection methods lack the focus on process needs and do not fully utilise quality management tools in the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework. In this context, this study aims to propose a novel, context-independent, and process-based Digital Opportunity Priority Assessment (DOPA) methodology. The proposed approach utilizes critical to quality measures (CTQs), the causes with potential adversary effects as alternatives, and the importance, frequency, and digital control level of CTQs as the criteria in TOPSIS. AHP and Fuzzy AHP validate CTQ importance criteria. The study also presents a real industry application to validate the proposed model.
分享
查看原文
基于过程的数字化机会和优先级评估(DOPA)的多准则组合决策框架
随着工业4.0及其配套技术的引入,服务业和制造业企业都面临着“数字化”的内外压力。在许多情况下,由于所需投资的初步基础,公司无法决定数字化举措。对于收益不确定的数字化优先级设置,现有的数字技术选择方法缺乏对流程需求的关注,也没有充分利用多标准决策(MCDM)框架中的质量管理工具。在这种背景下,本研究旨在提出一种新颖的、与上下文无关的、基于过程的数字机会优先级评估(DOPA)方法。所提出的方法利用关键质量措施(CTQ)、具有潜在对手影响的原因作为替代方案,以及CTQ的重要性、频率和数字控制水平作为TOPSIS中的标准。AHP和模糊AHP验证了CTQ重要性准则。该研究还提供了一个实际的行业应用来验证所提出的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信