Teorie poetów. Manifesty późnoawangardowe i poetyckie programy

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Joanna Orska
{"title":"Teorie poetów. Manifesty późnoawangardowe i poetyckie programy","authors":"Joanna Orska","doi":"10.14746/pt.2021.35.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research paper considers the avant-garde manifestos and programmatic statements of poets, in the light of the debate on the emancipatory potential of neoavant-garde art. The author shows the need to redefine the notion of artistic autonomy that new art programmes involve. In the first part of the article, the point of origin of the modern understanding of artistic autonomy is reflected on in its two basic formulas: Kantian and Hegelian. The second part evolves an analysis of three examples of contemporary metapoetic statements by Polish poets (Piotr Sommer, Andrzej Sosnowski, Kacper Bartczak). Their neoavant-garde premises of the performative character of the theoretical discussions, and of the artistic elements that connect their theoretical ideas to the actual works of these poets lead us to the conclusion that engaged, activistic poetic practice, concerning he rules directed by the questions of autonomy of art, cannot be judged from the point of view of the Kantian definition of this autonomy, especially if we take the poetical matter of avant-garde provenance into consideration.","PeriodicalId":37837,"journal":{"name":"Przestrzenie Teorii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przestrzenie Teorii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pt.2021.35.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research paper considers the avant-garde manifestos and programmatic statements of poets, in the light of the debate on the emancipatory potential of neoavant-garde art. The author shows the need to redefine the notion of artistic autonomy that new art programmes involve. In the first part of the article, the point of origin of the modern understanding of artistic autonomy is reflected on in its two basic formulas: Kantian and Hegelian. The second part evolves an analysis of three examples of contemporary metapoetic statements by Polish poets (Piotr Sommer, Andrzej Sosnowski, Kacper Bartczak). Their neoavant-garde premises of the performative character of the theoretical discussions, and of the artistic elements that connect their theoretical ideas to the actual works of these poets lead us to the conclusion that engaged, activistic poetic practice, concerning he rules directed by the questions of autonomy of art, cannot be judged from the point of view of the Kantian definition of this autonomy, especially if we take the poetical matter of avant-garde provenance into consideration.
本文从关于新前卫艺术的解放潜力的争论出发,考察了先锋派诗人的宣言和纲领性陈述。作者表明需要重新定义新的艺术项目所涉及的艺术自治的概念。本文第一部分以康德式和黑格尔式两个基本公式来考察现代艺术自主性认识的起源。第二部分对当代波兰诗人(Piotr Sommer, Andrzej Sosnowski, Kacper Bartczak)的三个元诗语句进行分析。他们的新先锋派前提是理论讨论的表演特征,以及将他们的理论思想与这些诗人的实际作品联系起来的艺术元素,这使我们得出这样的结论:从事的、积极的诗歌实践,涉及由艺术自治问题指导的规则,不能从康德对这种自治的定义的观点来判断,特别是如果我们考虑到先锋派起源的诗歌问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Przestrzenie Teorii
Przestrzenie Teorii Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: “Przestrzenie Teorii” is a theoretical and literary journal of scholarly criticism. The journal is peer-reviewed and reflects the research interests of authors from across a wide range of universities in Poland, as well as presents translations of texts of distinguished foreign theoreticians in literature. The journal undertakes to present key and essential problems in the contemporary criticism and theory of literature, and provides a platform for a transdisciplinary dialogue. The published texts, presented in diversified methodological approach, address both aesthetical and poetical problems in different areas of research, encompassing theatre and film, but also drama and art (in particular, visual and performative art forms). The journal is characterized by its interdiciplinary approach, participates in the present-day scholarly discourse in the philosophy of science and attempts to effect its policy of fostering the polyphonic form of literary studies in drama. “Przestrzenie Teorii” is published semi-annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信