From Production to Reception: Reading the Perambuliation

IF 0.1 2区 艺术学 0 ART
{"title":"From Production to Reception: Reading the Perambuliation","authors":"","doi":"10.1086/JWCI26614769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay traces some of the ways in which readers read and used Lambarde’s book. Their responses, and Lambarde’s reactions to them, tell a number of stories. Readers found the Perambulation a treasury of information about law, ecclesiastical history, geography and much more, as annotated copies of the book show. From the first, Lambarde insisted that admirers exaggerated his accomplishments. But he was pleased, as well as agitated, when William Camden made his book the model for his own survey of British history and topography, the Britannia (1586). Camden showed Lambarde a draft of his chapter on Kent before publication, and he incorporated Lambarde’s comments into the printed text. Like Lambarde, Camden had learned much from such friends as Abraham Ortelius, who encouraged his work as an antiquary. After Britannia appeared, the two men responded to one another’s ideas and worked them into new versions of their writing. The story of their friendship reveals that Lambarde continued to apply the collaborative approach that he had used when working with Laurence Nowell and Matthew parker—and suggests that it was typical more broadly for antiquarian scholarship.","PeriodicalId":45703,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","volume":"81 1","pages":"172 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/JWCI26614769","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay traces some of the ways in which readers read and used Lambarde’s book. Their responses, and Lambarde’s reactions to them, tell a number of stories. Readers found the Perambulation a treasury of information about law, ecclesiastical history, geography and much more, as annotated copies of the book show. From the first, Lambarde insisted that admirers exaggerated his accomplishments. But he was pleased, as well as agitated, when William Camden made his book the model for his own survey of British history and topography, the Britannia (1586). Camden showed Lambarde a draft of his chapter on Kent before publication, and he incorporated Lambarde’s comments into the printed text. Like Lambarde, Camden had learned much from such friends as Abraham Ortelius, who encouraged his work as an antiquary. After Britannia appeared, the two men responded to one another’s ideas and worked them into new versions of their writing. The story of their friendship reveals that Lambarde continued to apply the collaborative approach that he had used when working with Laurence Nowell and Matthew parker—and suggests that it was typical more broadly for antiquarian scholarship.
从生产到接收:阅读漫游
这篇文章追溯了读者阅读和使用兰巴德的书的一些方式。他们的反应,以及Lambarde对他们的反应,讲述了许多故事。读者们发现《漫步》是一个关于法律、教会历史、地理等信息的宝库,正如本书的注释副本所展示的那样。从一开始,兰巴德就坚持认为仰慕者夸大了他的成就。但是,当威廉·卡姆登把他的书作为他自己的英国历史和地形调查的模板——《不列颠尼亚》(1586)时,他既高兴又激动。卡姆登在出版前给兰巴德看了他关于肯特的一章的草稿,他把兰巴德的评论纳入了印刷文本中。像兰巴德一样,卡姆登从亚伯拉罕·奥特利乌斯这样的朋友那里学到了很多东西,他鼓励卡姆登从事古董工作。《不列颠尼亚》出版后,两人对彼此的想法作出回应,并将其改编成各自作品的新版本。他们的友谊故事表明,Lambarde继续运用他在与Laurence Nowell和Matthew parker合作时使用的合作方法,并暗示这是典型的更广泛的古物研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信