Knowledge and Attitudes of Midwives Concerning the Interpretation and Use of Cardiotocographs in Jordan

Q3 Nursing
Arwa Alsaraireh, D. Yehia, Atika Khalaf
{"title":"Knowledge and Attitudes of Midwives Concerning the Interpretation and Use of Cardiotocographs in Jordan","authors":"Arwa Alsaraireh, D. Yehia, Atika Khalaf","doi":"10.32598/jhnm.33.3.2461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A midwife needs to know how to assess fetal heart rates, recognize and interpret fetal heart patterns, report any substandard patterns, and initiate supportive measures as necessary. Objective: This study aims to assess the knowledge and attitudes of midwives concerning the interpretation and use of cardiotocographs. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study involves 183 midwives working in maternity units across all Jordanian regions. An online survey was used to collect data, including 6 demographic questions, 10 questions about knowledge, and 25 questions about attitude. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (Mean±SD, No. [%]), ANOVA, and the Pearson correlation tests. The significance level was set to be <0.05. Results: Most participants were 21 to 30 years old, and most midwives (59.6%) had no more than six years of experience. The result showed that the total scores for the knowledge and attitude regarding cardiotocographs (CTGs) interpretation and usage were 68.7% and 73.0%, respectively. There is a significant relationship between the knowledge about the interpretation and use of CTGs and the years of experience (P=0.003), with higher knowledge scores among midwives with fewer than 6 years of experience. Furthermore, there is a significant relationship between the knowledge of CTGs and level of education (P=0.002), indicating higher knowledge scores among midwives with a degree. The knowledge about classifying the CTG traces was significantly correlated with the region of work (P=0.018), with higher scores among midwives from the southern region. Finally, there was a positive correlation between knowledge and attitude (r=0.007, P<0.05). Conclusion: Based on the study result, the participant’s knowledge and attitudes are not satisfactory; thus, comprehensive education and training should be prioritized to improve midwives’ knowledge and attitudes toward using cardiotocograph.","PeriodicalId":36020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.33.3.2461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A midwife needs to know how to assess fetal heart rates, recognize and interpret fetal heart patterns, report any substandard patterns, and initiate supportive measures as necessary. Objective: This study aims to assess the knowledge and attitudes of midwives concerning the interpretation and use of cardiotocographs. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study involves 183 midwives working in maternity units across all Jordanian regions. An online survey was used to collect data, including 6 demographic questions, 10 questions about knowledge, and 25 questions about attitude. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (Mean±SD, No. [%]), ANOVA, and the Pearson correlation tests. The significance level was set to be <0.05. Results: Most participants were 21 to 30 years old, and most midwives (59.6%) had no more than six years of experience. The result showed that the total scores for the knowledge and attitude regarding cardiotocographs (CTGs) interpretation and usage were 68.7% and 73.0%, respectively. There is a significant relationship between the knowledge about the interpretation and use of CTGs and the years of experience (P=0.003), with higher knowledge scores among midwives with fewer than 6 years of experience. Furthermore, there is a significant relationship between the knowledge of CTGs and level of education (P=0.002), indicating higher knowledge scores among midwives with a degree. The knowledge about classifying the CTG traces was significantly correlated with the region of work (P=0.018), with higher scores among midwives from the southern region. Finally, there was a positive correlation between knowledge and attitude (r=0.007, P<0.05). Conclusion: Based on the study result, the participant’s knowledge and attitudes are not satisfactory; thus, comprehensive education and training should be prioritized to improve midwives’ knowledge and attitudes toward using cardiotocograph.
约旦助产士对心照学解释和使用的知识和态度
引言:助产士需要知道如何评估胎儿心率,识别和解释胎儿心脏模式,报告任何不合格的模式,并在必要时采取支持措施。目的:本研究旨在评估助产士对心电图解释和使用的知识和态度。材料和方法:这项横断面研究涉及约旦所有地区183名在产科工作的助产士。一项在线调查用于收集数据,包括6个人口统计学问题、10个关于知识的问题和25个关于态度的问题。使用描述性统计(平均值±标准差,编号[%])、方差分析和Pearson相关检验对数据进行分析。显著性水平设定为<0.05。结果:大多数参与者年龄在21至30岁之间,大多数助产士(59.6%)的经验不超过6年。结果显示,对心脏分娩图(CTG)解释和使用的知识和态度总分分别为68.7%和73.0%。CTG的解释和使用知识与经验年限之间存在显著关系(P=0.003),经验不足6年的助产士的知识得分较高。此外,CTG知识与教育水平之间存在显著关系(P=0.002),表明有学位的助产士的知识得分较高。关于CTG痕迹分类的知识与工作区域显著相关(P=0.018),南部地区的助产士得分更高。最后,知识与态度呈正相关(r=0.007,P<0.05)。结论:根据研究结果,参与者的知识和态度并不令人满意;因此,应优先进行全面的教育和培训,以提高助产士对使用心脏分娩图的知识和态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信