Adverse Skin Reactions Among Frontline Personnel Due To Personal Protective Equipment Against COVID-19

Maryam Adam Ali, Fatima Mohammed Aljasmi, Noora Adam, Ali
{"title":"Adverse Skin Reactions Among Frontline Personnel Due To Personal Protective Equipment Against COVID-19","authors":"Maryam Adam Ali, Fatima Mohammed Aljasmi, Noora Adam, Ali","doi":"10.26715/jbms.33_2021_2_2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has attracted global attention as it has expeditiously spread. Therefore, adherence to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) has become a daily necessity, particularly among front-line personnel. However, PPE is associated with some adverse skin reactions; hence, this study aimed to investigate the characteristics and prevalence of adverse skin reactions from PPE usage.\n\nMethods: This cross-sectional study with a random sample was carried out at Bahrain Defense Force Hospital (BDF) from January to March 2021, targeting the front-line personnel. An online questionnaire was sent regarding adverse skin reactions from PPE. A total of 145 healthcare workers (HCWs) were approached, and 132 (91%) responded. The results were analyzed through SPSS 21.0 software, and the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze discrete variables.\n\nResults: A total of 100 (75.8%) respondents suffered from adverse skin reactions. The most common findings were skin dryness, 100 (75.8%); itchiness, 67 (50.8%); and acne, 48 (36.4%). The most affected distant site was hands, 92 (69.7%). Female gender was significantly associated with skin changes, and only 22 (22%) participants with adverse skin reactions took medical advice.\n\nConclusion: Adverse skin reactions from PPE were common. Therefore, improving awareness of practical methods is quintessential.\n\nKeywords: COVID-19; Eczema; Hand Hygiene; Masks; Skin Care","PeriodicalId":85027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society = Majallat Jam'iyat al-Atibba' al-Bahrayniyah","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society = Majallat Jam'iyat al-Atibba' al-Bahrayniyah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26715/jbms.33_2021_2_2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has attracted global attention as it has expeditiously spread. Therefore, adherence to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) has become a daily necessity, particularly among front-line personnel. However, PPE is associated with some adverse skin reactions; hence, this study aimed to investigate the characteristics and prevalence of adverse skin reactions from PPE usage. Methods: This cross-sectional study with a random sample was carried out at Bahrain Defense Force Hospital (BDF) from January to March 2021, targeting the front-line personnel. An online questionnaire was sent regarding adverse skin reactions from PPE. A total of 145 healthcare workers (HCWs) were approached, and 132 (91%) responded. The results were analyzed through SPSS 21.0 software, and the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze discrete variables. Results: A total of 100 (75.8%) respondents suffered from adverse skin reactions. The most common findings were skin dryness, 100 (75.8%); itchiness, 67 (50.8%); and acne, 48 (36.4%). The most affected distant site was hands, 92 (69.7%). Female gender was significantly associated with skin changes, and only 22 (22%) participants with adverse skin reactions took medical advice. Conclusion: Adverse skin reactions from PPE were common. Therefore, improving awareness of practical methods is quintessential. Keywords: COVID-19; Eczema; Hand Hygiene; Masks; Skin Care
新冠肺炎个人防护设备引起的一线人员皮肤不良反应
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)因其迅速传播而引起全球关注。因此,穿戴个人防护装备已成为日常必需品,尤其是一线人员。然而,个人防护装备与一些皮肤不良反应有关;因此,本研究旨在调查PPE使用引起的皮肤不良反应的特点和流行程度。方法:本横断面研究于2021年1 - 3月在巴林国防军医院(BDF)进行,随机抽样,以一线人员为研究对象。发送了一份关于个人防护用品皮肤不良反应的在线问卷。共接触了145名卫生保健工作者(HCWs),其中132人(91%)做出了回应。结果通过SPSS 21.0软件进行分析,离散变量分析采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。结果:100例(75.8%)患者出现皮肤不良反应。最常见的症状是皮肤干燥,100例(75.8%);瘙痒67例(50.8%);痤疮48例(36.4%)。受影响最大的远处部位是手,92例(69.7%)。女性性别与皮肤变化显著相关,只有22名(22%)有皮肤不良反应的参与者接受了医疗建议。结论:PPE皮肤不良反应较为常见。因此,提高对实用方法的认识是必不可少的。关键词:COVID-19;湿疹;手卫生;面具;皮肤护理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信