“Am besten, du gehst.” Zur nähesprachlichen Verwendung des am-Superlativs im Vor-Vorfeld

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Glottotheory Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1515/glot-2019-0001

D. Höhmann

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the use of the German am-superlative in colloquial utterances such as am besten, du gehst jetzt. In a first approximation, this construction can be described as elliptically used am-superlative occurring on the left sentence periphery within an Operator-Skopus-Struktur (Barden/Elstermann/Fiehler 2001). As will be shown in the empirical core part of the study, a qualitative-quantitative analysis, the pattern appears to be characterized by different overlapping and interplaying tendencies in language use (e.g. the selection and frequency of pronouns and sentence mood). The data used for the qualitative-quantitative analysis is taken mainly from a large-scale web corpus (deTenTen13).

查看原文本刊更多论文

“最好。”提前使用缝纫语言中的am最高级

摘要本文研究了德语am-最高级在am best, du gehst jetzt等口语话语中的用法。在第一个近似中，这种结构可以被描述为在Operator-Skopus-Struktur的左句外围椭圆地使用am- super最高级(Barden/Elstermann/Fiehler 2001)。在本研究的实证核心部分，即定性与定量分析中，我们可以看到这种模式在语言使用上呈现出不同的重叠和相互作用趋势(如代词和句子语气的选择和频率)。用于定性-定量分析的数据主要来自大型网络语料库(deTenTen13)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Glottotheory Arts and Humanities-History

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The foci of Glottotheory are: observations and descriptions of all aspects of language and text phenomena including the areas of psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, dialectology, pragmatics, etc. on all levels of linguistic analysis, applications of methods, models or findings from quantitative linguistics concerning problems of natural language processing, language teaching, documentation and information retrieval, methodological problems of linguistic measurement, model construction, sampling and test theory, epistemological issues such as explanation of language and text phenomena, contributions to theory construction, systems theory, philosophy of science. The journal considers itself as platform for a dialogue between quantitative and qualitative linguistics.