The Rise of Entrepreneurial Political Parties in European Politics Vít Hloušek, Lubomír Kopeček, and Petra Vodová. Palgrave, 2020. 228 pp., 90€

IF 1.7 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
G. Passarelli
{"title":"The Rise of Entrepreneurial Political Parties in European Politics Vít Hloušek, Lubomír Kopeček, and Petra Vodová. Palgrave, 2020. 228 pp., 90€","authors":"G. Passarelli","doi":"10.1017/ipo.2020.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political parties are strange animals. The study of them in fact indicates a paradox. Despite many definitions and a vast and consolidated literature grounded on well-established thinking and contributions of outstanding scholars, there is a lack of knowledge on what political parties relay are today. This weakness in understanding is not simply ontologically related to the ongoing and never-ending story of human research especially in social science, it also depends on the fact that the models that have been proposed are somehow limited in their general impact by different biases. The mass party often referred to as the model for political organisation represents in fact the exception, being mostly, and almost exclusively present in western European countries. Other very interesting and useful intuitions, such as the cartel party or the catch-all party are able to photograph some parties, at some point, in a given context but often they do not grasp the essence of what is happening to the most important collective political actor all over the world. It is not an easy task and probably it is inconceivable to go far from a minimal definition of what a party is in order to cover all the organisations falling into the same category. At the same time, the dramatic changes that have invested society and politics since the late Sixties of the 19th century have shown the need for a change and a continuous adaption of the analytical paradigm to define the political parties. This latter impellent push for frequent adaption to real life is remarkably bigger when we move from the organisational approach to the definition of what the political parties’ tasks and functions are. Therefore, we can rely on a good amount of information, literature, and comparative research concerning the organisational aspects and definition of the political party, but we are still searching to catch its fundamental functions, actions, and the reason why it acts in a way or another. The rise of entrepreneurial political parties in European politics represents a timely publication. The topic is hugely overlooked in the literature, and the book courageously published by Palgrave represents a very important contribution that will become a landmark for those dealing with the argument. The book written by Vít Hloušek, Lubomír Kopeček, and Petra Vodová is the arrival point of many kinds of research that they have been carrying around the theme of political leadership. It confirms the vivacity of the research group based at the Masaryk University that is proposing interesting researches from a few years now. The book, which is divided into six chapters, covers four main sub-types of the entrepreneurial political parties. From the theoretical point of view, the authors compare European countries from West to Central and Eastern contexts. They indicate that recently there has been the rise of many ‘new entrepreneurial parties, which have been popping up since the late twentieth century to challenge long-term voting patterns and traditional arrangements of party competition’ (p. 9). Authors recognise that the perspective of politics as indicated by J. A. Schumpeter is useful, but he has considered the internal dynamics of politics as inspired to the economics field.","PeriodicalId":43368,"journal":{"name":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2020.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political parties are strange animals. The study of them in fact indicates a paradox. Despite many definitions and a vast and consolidated literature grounded on well-established thinking and contributions of outstanding scholars, there is a lack of knowledge on what political parties relay are today. This weakness in understanding is not simply ontologically related to the ongoing and never-ending story of human research especially in social science, it also depends on the fact that the models that have been proposed are somehow limited in their general impact by different biases. The mass party often referred to as the model for political organisation represents in fact the exception, being mostly, and almost exclusively present in western European countries. Other very interesting and useful intuitions, such as the cartel party or the catch-all party are able to photograph some parties, at some point, in a given context but often they do not grasp the essence of what is happening to the most important collective political actor all over the world. It is not an easy task and probably it is inconceivable to go far from a minimal definition of what a party is in order to cover all the organisations falling into the same category. At the same time, the dramatic changes that have invested society and politics since the late Sixties of the 19th century have shown the need for a change and a continuous adaption of the analytical paradigm to define the political parties. This latter impellent push for frequent adaption to real life is remarkably bigger when we move from the organisational approach to the definition of what the political parties’ tasks and functions are. Therefore, we can rely on a good amount of information, literature, and comparative research concerning the organisational aspects and definition of the political party, but we are still searching to catch its fundamental functions, actions, and the reason why it acts in a way or another. The rise of entrepreneurial political parties in European politics represents a timely publication. The topic is hugely overlooked in the literature, and the book courageously published by Palgrave represents a very important contribution that will become a landmark for those dealing with the argument. The book written by Vít Hloušek, Lubomír Kopeček, and Petra Vodová is the arrival point of many kinds of research that they have been carrying around the theme of political leadership. It confirms the vivacity of the research group based at the Masaryk University that is proposing interesting researches from a few years now. The book, which is divided into six chapters, covers four main sub-types of the entrepreneurial political parties. From the theoretical point of view, the authors compare European countries from West to Central and Eastern contexts. They indicate that recently there has been the rise of many ‘new entrepreneurial parties, which have been popping up since the late twentieth century to challenge long-term voting patterns and traditional arrangements of party competition’ (p. 9). Authors recognise that the perspective of politics as indicated by J. A. Schumpeter is useful, but he has considered the internal dynamics of politics as inspired to the economics field.
创业政党在欧洲政治中的崛起Vít Hloušek、Lubomír Kopeček和Petra Vodová。帕尔格雷夫,2020年。228人,90欧元
政党是奇怪的动物。对它们的研究实际上表明了一个悖论。尽管有许多定义和基于杰出学者的成熟思想和贡献的大量和巩固的文献,但对今天的政党中继是什么缺乏了解。这种理解上的弱点不仅仅是与人类研究(尤其是社会科学)的持续和永无止境的故事在本体论上有关,它还取决于这样一个事实,即所提出的模型在某种程度上受到不同偏见的限制,其总体影响有限。通常被认为是政治组织模式的群众性政党实际上是一个例外,它主要存在于西欧国家,而且几乎完全存在于西欧国家。其他一些非常有趣和有用的直觉,如卡特尔党或包罗万象党,能够在特定背景下拍摄某些政党,但它们往往无法把握世界上最重要的集体政治行动者正在发生的事情的本质。这不是一项容易的任务,而且可能难以想象,为了涵盖所有属于同一类别的组织,要远远超出对政党的最小定义。与此同时,自19世纪60年代末以来,社会和政治发生了巨大变化,这表明需要改变和不断适应定义政党的分析范式。当我们从组织方法转向政党任务和职能的定义时,后者对频繁适应现实生活的推动作用明显更大。因此,关于政党的组织方面和定义,我们可以依靠大量的信息、文献和比较研究,但我们仍在寻找它的基本功能、行动以及它以某种方式行动的原因。创业型政党在欧洲政坛的崛起是一个及时的例证。这个话题在文献中被极大地忽视了,帕尔格雷夫勇敢地出版的这本书代表了一个非常重要的贡献,它将成为那些处理争论的人的里程碑。这本书由Vít Hloušek, Lubomír kope ek和Petra vodov撰写,是他们围绕政治领导力主题进行的许多研究的起点。这证实了马萨里克大学(Masaryk University)研究小组的活力,该小组几年来提出了一些有趣的研究成果。这本书分为六个章节,涵盖了企业家政党的四个主要子类型。从理论的角度,作者将欧洲国家从西方语境与中欧语境和东方语境进行了比较。他们指出,最近出现了许多“自20世纪末以来不断涌现的新企业政党,它们挑战了长期的投票模式和政党竞争的传统安排”(第9页)。作者认识到熊彼特(J. A. Schumpeter)所指出的政治视角是有用的,但他认为政治的内部动态受到了经济学领域的启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信