Cleistocarpous Tortella species from South America comprise a new genus of Pottiaceae

IF 0.8 4区生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES

Bryologist Pub Date : 2021-07-26 DOI:10.1639/0007-2745-124.3.385

R. Zander, G. Suárez, S. Jiménez

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract. Anaschisma, a new genus of Pottiaceae, is distinguished from both Tortella and Trichostomum by the caducous, cleistocarpous capsule, and from Aschisma by capsule dehiscence irregular, not circumscissle. It is similar to Aschisma in the denticulate, weakly bordered cauline leaves, broadest at the base, and tendency to secund leaf stance. Four species of South America comprise the genus, two of them new to science. The new genus is an apparent descendant of Trichostomum brachydontium because gametophytes are nearly identical but unlike other species of that genus. Trichostomum planifolium is newly reported for Brazil. Corrections are made to a previous treatment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

来自南美洲的闭锁桃属(Cleistocarpous Tortella)构成了壶科的一个新属

摘要Anasplima是Pottiaceae的一个新属，与Tortella和Trichostomum的区别在于其早落、密裂的荚膜，与Aschisma的区别在于荚膜不规则而非周裂。它与Aschisma相似，茎生叶具小齿，边缘微弱，基部最宽，倾向于稳固的叶位。南美洲的四个物种组成了该属，其中两个是科学上的新物种。这个新属显然是短齿毛口菌的后代，因为配子体几乎相同，但与该属的其他物种不同。平叶毛口菌是巴西最新报道的一种。对以前的治疗进行了纠正。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Bryologist 生物-植物科学

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

11.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Bryologist is an international journal devoted to all aspects of bryology and lichenology, and we welcome reviews, research papers and short communications from all members of American Bryological and Lichenological Society (ABLS). We also publish lists of current literature, book reviews and news items about members and event. All back issues of the journal are maintained electronically. The first issue of The Bryologist was published in 1898, with the formation of the Society. Author instructions are available from the journal website and the manuscript submission site, each of which is listed at the ABLS.org website. All submissions to the journal are subject to at least two peer reviews, and both the reviews and the identities of reviewers are treated confidentially. Reviewers are asked to acknowledge possible conflicts of interest and to provide strictly objective assessments of the suitability and scholarly merit of the submissions under review.