Improving the firm innovation capacity through the adoption of standardized innovation management systems: a comparative analysis of the ISO 56002:2019 with the literature on firm innovation capacity

IF 0.5 Q4 BUSINESS
Silvio Bitencourt da Silva
{"title":"Improving the firm innovation capacity through the adoption of standardized innovation management systems: a comparative analysis of the ISO 56002:2019 with the literature on firm innovation capacity","authors":"Silvio Bitencourt da Silva","doi":"10.5585/IJI.V9I2.19273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective of the study: Investigate how firm innovation capacity can be improved by adopting ISO 56002: 2019. Methodology/approach: The methodology adopted is a comparative analysis of the ISO 56002: 2019 with the literature on firm innovation capacity. The methods employed in the study included a review of the literature on the dynamic capabilities and firm innovation capacity, and qualitative documentary research that consisted of three phases: pre-analysis, organization of documents, and the analysis of results, using information from the texts of the guidelines and processes indicated by ISO 56002: 2019, which additionally involved the ISO 56000 family of standards. Originality/Relevance: The adoption of innovation management standards generates several theoretical challenges when exploring details of their implementation systematically and routinely and empirical challenges such as understanding the advent of ISO 56002: 2019 for innovation management. Main results: Similarities were found between the determinants of innovation capacity and the ISO 56002: 2019 Clauses, as each of the seven factors found a relationship with one or more ISO 56002: 2019 clauses. Theoretical/methodological contributions: The findings obtained can be used by researchers interested in studying different innovation management models, innovation capacity, and, particularly, the dynamics of continuous improvement of the performance of an innovation management system and its interrelationship and interaction with other factors. Social/management contributions: Contrary to common sense in which the normalization of innovation management seems to be counter-intuitive, it is suggested that the adoption of ISO 56002: 2019 allows the innovation process to be managed, systematized, and replicated improving firm innovation capacity.","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":"9 1","pages":"389-413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/IJI.V9I2.19273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective of the study: Investigate how firm innovation capacity can be improved by adopting ISO 56002: 2019. Methodology/approach: The methodology adopted is a comparative analysis of the ISO 56002: 2019 with the literature on firm innovation capacity. The methods employed in the study included a review of the literature on the dynamic capabilities and firm innovation capacity, and qualitative documentary research that consisted of three phases: pre-analysis, organization of documents, and the analysis of results, using information from the texts of the guidelines and processes indicated by ISO 56002: 2019, which additionally involved the ISO 56000 family of standards. Originality/Relevance: The adoption of innovation management standards generates several theoretical challenges when exploring details of their implementation systematically and routinely and empirical challenges such as understanding the advent of ISO 56002: 2019 for innovation management. Main results: Similarities were found between the determinants of innovation capacity and the ISO 56002: 2019 Clauses, as each of the seven factors found a relationship with one or more ISO 56002: 2019 clauses. Theoretical/methodological contributions: The findings obtained can be used by researchers interested in studying different innovation management models, innovation capacity, and, particularly, the dynamics of continuous improvement of the performance of an innovation management system and its interrelationship and interaction with other factors. Social/management contributions: Contrary to common sense in which the normalization of innovation management seems to be counter-intuitive, it is suggested that the adoption of ISO 56002: 2019 allows the innovation process to be managed, systematized, and replicated improving firm innovation capacity.
通过采用标准化创新管理体系提高企业创新能力:ISO 56002:2019与企业创新能力文献的比较分析
研究目标:调查如何通过采用ISO 56002:2019来提高企业创新能力。方法/方法:采用的方法是对ISO 56002:2019与企业创新能力文献的比较分析。研究中采用的方法包括回顾关于动态能力和企业创新能力的文献,以及由三个阶段组成的定性文献研究:预分析、文件组织和结果分析,使用ISO 56002:2019指示的指南和流程文本中的信息,它还涉及ISO 56000系列标准。独创性/相关性:创新管理标准的采用在系统和常规地探索其实施细节时产生了一些理论挑战,以及经验挑战,如理解创新管理ISO 56002:2019的出现。主要结果:创新能力的决定因素与ISO 56002:2019条款之间存在相似性,因为七个因素中的每一个都与一个或多个ISO 56002:22019条款存在关系。理论/方法学贡献:研究人员有兴趣研究不同的创新管理模式、创新能力,特别是创新管理系统绩效持续改进的动态及其与其他因素的相互关系和相互作用,可以使用所获得的研究结果。社会/管理贡献:与创新管理的规范化似乎违反直觉的常识相反,建议采用ISO 56002:2019可以对创新过程进行管理、系统化和复制,从而提高企业的创新能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信