Carbon footprint estimate in the primary wood processing industry in El Salto, Durango

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Pedro Meza-López, E. n, Mayra K. Trujillo-Delgado, Alan U. Burciaga-Álvarez, Ricardo de la Cruz-Carrera, J. A. Nájera-Luna
{"title":"Carbon footprint estimate in the primary wood processing industry in El Salto, Durango","authors":"Pedro Meza-López, E. n, Mayra K. Trujillo-Delgado, Alan U. Burciaga-Álvarez, Ricardo de la Cruz-Carrera, J. A. Nájera-Luna","doi":"10.5154/r.rchscfa.2019.07.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The primary wood processing industry releases greenhouse gases \n(GHGs); their mitigation involves measuring the carbon footprint. \nObjective: To estimate the carbon footprint of two forestry companies dedicated to the \nprimary transformation of wood. Materials and methods: Companies established as organizational boundaries L1 and \nL2 have two (Q1 and Q2) and one (D) sawmill, respectively. The operational limits were \nA1 (direct emissions from fossil fuel consumption), A2 (indirect emissions from electricity \nconsumption) and A3 (emission sources not owned by L1 and L2). GHG emissions were \ncalculated in two annuities with the method of using documented activity data and \nemission factors level 1. The annuities were compared with the Student’ t-test and \nWilcoxon test, and the sawmills with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results and discussion: The estimated carbon footprint for L1 was 480.06 tCO 2 e·year - \n1 , where A1, A2 and A3 represented 29.32 %, 14.59 % and 56.09 %, respectively. L2 \nhad a footprint of 230.56 tCO 2 e·year -1 of which 9.39 %, 11.78 % and 78.83 % \ncorresponded to the categories A1, A2 and A3, respectively. The cumulative uncertainty \nwas within a fair range of accuracy (±25 %). Only the direct GHG emissions between L1 \nannuities were statistically different (P < 0.05). Mechanical technology made the \ndifference in GHG emissions among sawmills (P Conclusions: The carbon footprint is inherent to the energy used; energy management \nensures the mitigation of GHG emissions.","PeriodicalId":54479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2019.07.060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The primary wood processing industry releases greenhouse gases (GHGs); their mitigation involves measuring the carbon footprint. Objective: To estimate the carbon footprint of two forestry companies dedicated to the primary transformation of wood. Materials and methods: Companies established as organizational boundaries L1 and L2 have two (Q1 and Q2) and one (D) sawmill, respectively. The operational limits were A1 (direct emissions from fossil fuel consumption), A2 (indirect emissions from electricity consumption) and A3 (emission sources not owned by L1 and L2). GHG emissions were calculated in two annuities with the method of using documented activity data and emission factors level 1. The annuities were compared with the Student’ t-test and Wilcoxon test, and the sawmills with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results and discussion: The estimated carbon footprint for L1 was 480.06 tCO 2 e·year - 1 , where A1, A2 and A3 represented 29.32 %, 14.59 % and 56.09 %, respectively. L2 had a footprint of 230.56 tCO 2 e·year -1 of which 9.39 %, 11.78 % and 78.83 % corresponded to the categories A1, A2 and A3, respectively. The cumulative uncertainty was within a fair range of accuracy (±25 %). Only the direct GHG emissions between L1 annuities were statistically different (P < 0.05). Mechanical technology made the difference in GHG emissions among sawmills (P Conclusions: The carbon footprint is inherent to the energy used; energy management ensures the mitigation of GHG emissions.
杜兰戈萨尔托初级木材加工业的碳足迹估计
简介:木材初级加工行业排放温室气体;他们的缓解措施包括测量碳足迹。目的:估算两家致力于木材初级转化的林业公司的碳足迹。材料和方法:作为组织边界L1和L2建立的公司分别有两个(Q1和Q2)和一个(D)锯木厂。运行限值为A1(化石燃料消耗的直接排放)、A2(电力消耗的间接排放)和A3(L1和L2不拥有的排放源)。GHG排放量以两个年金计算,方法是使用记录的活动数据和1级排放因子。将年金与Student t检验和Wilcoxon检验进行比较,并将锯木厂与Kruskal-Wallis检验进行比较。结果和讨论:L1的估计碳足迹为480.06 tCO2 e·year-1,其中A1、A2和A3分别占29.32%、14.59%和56.09%。L2的足迹为230.56 tCO2 e·year-1,其中分别有9.39%、11.78%和78.83%对应于A1、A2和A3类。累积不确定度在合理的准确度范围内(±25%)。只有L1年金之间的直接GHG排放在统计学上有差异(P<0.05)。机械技术使锯木厂之间的GHG排放有所差异(P结论:碳足迹是所用能源固有的;能源管理确保了GHG排放的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente (RCHSCFA) is a scientific journal that aims to raise awareness of high-quality research products related to forest, arid, temperate and tropical environments in the world. Since its foundation in 1994, the RCHSCFA has served as a space for scientific dissemination and discussion at a national and international level among academics, researchers, undergraduate and graduate students, forest managers and public/private entities that are interested in the forest environment. All content published in the journal first goes through a strict triple-blind review process and is published in the following formats: Scientific Articles, Review Articles, Methodologies, Technical or Technological Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信