Learning from an equitable, data-informed response to COVID-19: Translating knowledge into future action and preparation

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Morgen Stanzler, Johanna Figueroa, Andrew F. Beck, Marianne E. McPherson, Steve Miff, Heidi Penix, Jessica Little, Bhargavi Sampath, Pierre Barker, David M. Hartley
{"title":"Learning from an equitable, data-informed response to COVID-19: Translating knowledge into future action and preparation","authors":"Morgen Stanzler,&nbsp;Johanna Figueroa,&nbsp;Andrew F. Beck,&nbsp;Marianne E. McPherson,&nbsp;Steve Miff,&nbsp;Heidi Penix,&nbsp;Jessica Little,&nbsp;Bhargavi Sampath,&nbsp;Pierre Barker,&nbsp;David M. Hartley","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic revealed numerous barriers to effectively managing public health crises, including difficulties in using publicly available, community-level data to create learning systems in support of local public health decision responses. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, a group of health care partners began meeting to learn from their collective experiences. We identified key tools and processes for using data and learning system structures to drive equitable public health decision making throughout different phases of the pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In fall of 2021, the team developed an initial theory of change directed at achieving herd immunity for COVID-19. The theoretical drivers were explored qualitatively through a series of nine 45-min telephonic interviews conducted with 16 public health and community leaders across the United States. Interview responses were analyzed into key themes to inform potential future practices, tools, and systems. In addition to the interviews, partners in Dallas and Cincinnati reflected on their own COVID-19 experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Interview responses fell broadly into four themes that contribute to effective, community driven responses to COVID-19: real-time, accessible data that are mindful of the tension between community transparency and individual privacy; a continued fostering of public trust; adaptable infrastructures and systems; and creating cohesive community coalitions with shared alignment and goals. These themes and partner experiences helped us revise our preliminary theory of change around the importance of community collaboration and trust building and also helped refine the development of the Community Protection Dashboard tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There was broad agreement amongst public health and community leaders about the key elements of the data and learning systems required to manage public health responses to COVID-19. These findings may be informative for guiding the use of data and learning in the management of future public health crises or population health initiatives.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10369","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed numerous barriers to effectively managing public health crises, including difficulties in using publicly available, community-level data to create learning systems in support of local public health decision responses. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, a group of health care partners began meeting to learn from their collective experiences. We identified key tools and processes for using data and learning system structures to drive equitable public health decision making throughout different phases of the pandemic.

Methods

In fall of 2021, the team developed an initial theory of change directed at achieving herd immunity for COVID-19. The theoretical drivers were explored qualitatively through a series of nine 45-min telephonic interviews conducted with 16 public health and community leaders across the United States. Interview responses were analyzed into key themes to inform potential future practices, tools, and systems. In addition to the interviews, partners in Dallas and Cincinnati reflected on their own COVID-19 experiences.

Results

Interview responses fell broadly into four themes that contribute to effective, community driven responses to COVID-19: real-time, accessible data that are mindful of the tension between community transparency and individual privacy; a continued fostering of public trust; adaptable infrastructures and systems; and creating cohesive community coalitions with shared alignment and goals. These themes and partner experiences helped us revise our preliminary theory of change around the importance of community collaboration and trust building and also helped refine the development of the Community Protection Dashboard tool.

Conclusions

There was broad agreement amongst public health and community leaders about the key elements of the data and learning systems required to manage public health responses to COVID-19. These findings may be informative for guiding the use of data and learning in the management of future public health crises or population health initiatives.

Abstract Image

从公平、数据知情的COVID - 19应对中学习:将知识转化为未来的行动和准备
导读:2019冠状病毒病大流行揭示了有效管理公共卫生危机的诸多障碍,包括难以利用可公开获得的社区数据创建学习系统,以支持地方公共卫生决策响应。在2019冠状病毒病大流行初期,一批卫生保健合作伙伴开始开会,从他们的集体经验中学习。我们确定了在大流行的不同阶段使用数据和学习系统结构来推动公平的公共卫生决策的关键工具和程序。方法:在2021年秋季,该团队开发了一个旨在实现COVID-19群体免疫的初步变革理论。通过与美国16位公共卫生和社区领导人进行的一系列9次45分钟的电话访谈,对理论驱动因素进行了定性探讨。访谈的回答被分析成关键主题,以告知潜在的未来实践、工具和系统。除了采访之外,达拉斯和辛辛那提的合作伙伴还讲述了他们自己的COVID-19经历。结果:访谈的回答大致分为四个主题,有助于有效地、社区驱动地应对COVID-19:考虑到社区透明度与个人隐私之间的紧张关系的实时、可访问数据;继续培养公众信任;适应性强的基础设施和系统;以及建立具有共同立场和目标的凝聚力社区联盟。这些主题和合作伙伴的经验帮助我们修改了关于社区协作和建立信任重要性的初步变革理论,并帮助完善了社区保护仪表板工具的开发。结论:公共卫生和社区领导人对管理COVID-19公共卫生应对所需的数据和学习系统的关键要素达成了广泛共识。这些发现可能有助于指导在管理未来公共卫生危机或人口健康举措中使用数据和学习。©2023作者。由Wiley期刊有限责任公司代表密歇根大学出版的学习健康系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信