Joint cartilage experimental defect regeneration by hierarchic biphasic combined grafts

V. Cobzac, M. Jian, T. Globa, V. Nacu
{"title":"Joint cartilage experimental defect regeneration by hierarchic biphasic combined grafts","authors":"V. Cobzac, M. Jian, T. Globa, V. Nacu","doi":"10.52418/moldovan-med-j.65-2.22.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The existing surgical techniques used to regenerate articular cartilage fail. Utilisation of hierarchical, biphasic structures obtained from osteochondral tissue, through demineralisation, decellularization, longitudinal perforation and combination with chondroprogenitor cells, presents a high potential in cartilage defects regeneration. Material and methods: The research was performed on 36 rabbits, separated equally in two experimental and one control group. In the experimental groups, the experimental osteochondral defects of 4-4.5 mm in depth, were performed with a 3.7 drill bit at the level of weight bearing surface of the medial femoral condyle. In the 1st group the defects were treated with grafts combined with autologous chondrocytes, and in the 2nd group with grafts combined with autologous mesenchymal stem cells. In the control group, cartilaginous defects were treated by transferring the osteochondral plugs taken from the trochlear groove. The rabbits were removed from the experiment at 6 and 12 weeks. The results were evaluated by Unified Histological Score of Regenerated Cartilage (UHSRC). Results: At 6 weeks, according to UHSRC, the 1st group had 28.33±1.53 points, the 2nd group –27.67±2.08 points and the control group –26.33±1.53 points (p˃0.1; p˃0.2). At 12 weeks the 1st group had 18.68±5 points, the 2nd group –14.89±3.76 points and the control group –17.22 ±4.84 points (p˃0.5; p˃0.2). Conclusions: According to UHSRC, the experimental groups don’t show a significant difference compared to the control group at 6 and 12 weeks, also the quality of regenerated cartilage is poor.","PeriodicalId":32733,"journal":{"name":"The Moldovan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Moldovan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52418/moldovan-med-j.65-2.22.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The existing surgical techniques used to regenerate articular cartilage fail. Utilisation of hierarchical, biphasic structures obtained from osteochondral tissue, through demineralisation, decellularization, longitudinal perforation and combination with chondroprogenitor cells, presents a high potential in cartilage defects regeneration. Material and methods: The research was performed on 36 rabbits, separated equally in two experimental and one control group. In the experimental groups, the experimental osteochondral defects of 4-4.5 mm in depth, were performed with a 3.7 drill bit at the level of weight bearing surface of the medial femoral condyle. In the 1st group the defects were treated with grafts combined with autologous chondrocytes, and in the 2nd group with grafts combined with autologous mesenchymal stem cells. In the control group, cartilaginous defects were treated by transferring the osteochondral plugs taken from the trochlear groove. The rabbits were removed from the experiment at 6 and 12 weeks. The results were evaluated by Unified Histological Score of Regenerated Cartilage (UHSRC). Results: At 6 weeks, according to UHSRC, the 1st group had 28.33±1.53 points, the 2nd group –27.67±2.08 points and the control group –26.33±1.53 points (p˃0.1; p˃0.2). At 12 weeks the 1st group had 18.68±5 points, the 2nd group –14.89±3.76 points and the control group –17.22 ±4.84 points (p˃0.5; p˃0.2). Conclusions: According to UHSRC, the experimental groups don’t show a significant difference compared to the control group at 6 and 12 weeks, also the quality of regenerated cartilage is poor.
分层双相联合移植修复关节软骨实验性缺损
背景:现有的用于关节软骨再生的手术技术失败了。利用从骨软骨组织中获得的分级双相结构,通过脱矿化、脱细胞、纵向穿孔和与软骨祖细胞结合,在软骨缺损再生中具有很高的潜力。材料和方法:本研究采用36只家兔,分为两组实验组和一组对照组。在实验组中,用3.7钻头在股骨内侧髁的承重表面水平处进行深度为4-4.5mm的实验性骨软骨缺损。在第一组中,用移植物结合自体软骨细胞治疗缺损,在第二组中用移植物联合自体间充质干细胞治疗缺损。在对照组中,软骨缺损通过转移从滑车沟取出的骨软骨塞来治疗。在第6周和第12周将兔子从实验中取出。结果通过再生软骨的统一组织学评分(UHSRC)进行评估。结果:在6周时,根据UHSRC,第一组为28.33±1.53分,第二组为27.67±2.08分,对照组为26.33±1.54分(p<0.1;p<0.2)。在12周时,第一组有18.68±5分,实验组在6周和12周时与对照组相比没有显著差异,再生软骨质量也较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信