Ten recommendations for political ecology case research

IF 2 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Journal of Political Ecology Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.2458/jpe.2842

Cornelia Helmcke

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Contributions in political ecology draw heavily on case study research. This has triggered questions regarding the wider theoretical relevance to such studies. This article argues that one of the main shortcomings of political ecology case studies is not their wider applicability, but that scholars often miss reflection on their chosen cases and case methodology. The purpose of the article is to examine the continued relevance of case study research, especially within more recent advances of political ecology, and to develop ten recommendations for how a political ecology case study could overcome identified weaknesses.

查看原文本刊更多论文

政治生态学案例研究十大建议

政治生态学的贡献很大程度上依赖于案例研究。这引发了关于这类研究的更广泛的理论相关性的问题。本文认为，政治生态学案例研究的主要缺陷之一不在于其广泛的适用性，而在于学者们往往忽略了对他们所选择的案例和案例方法论的反思。本文的目的是研究案例研究的持续相关性，特别是在政治生态学的最新进展中，并就政治生态学案例研究如何克服已确定的弱点提出十条建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Political Ecology ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

17.40%

发文量

审稿时长

17 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Political Ecology is a peer reviewed journal (ISSN: 1073-0451), one of the longest standing, Gold Open Access journals in the social sciences. It began in 1994 and welcomes submissions in English, French and Spanish. We encourage research into the linkages between political economy and human environmental impacts across different locations and academic disciplines. The approach used in the journal is political ecology, not other fields, and authors should state clearly how their work contributes to, or extends, this approach. See, for example, the POLLEN network, or the ENTITLE blog.