Account books as social technologies

IF 0.8 4区管理学 Q1 HISTORY

Management & Organizational History Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17449359.2023.2182321

Rachel Tamar Van

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article discusses how historians have reconceived account books from a source that describes economic and social actions to a social technology that constructs them. It examines the interpretive changes that this turn entailed and illustrates its application to three types of historical relationships: time, slavery, and the family. It aims to de-mystify account books as sources requiring unilateral, expert interpretation to one that is open to a variety of interpretive possibilities.

查看原文本刊更多论文

作为社会技术的账簿

本文讨论了历史学家如何将账簿从描述经济和社会行为的来源重新定义为构建它们的社会技术。它考察了这种转变所带来的解释性变化，并说明了它在三种历史关系中的应用:时间、奴隶制和家庭。它的目的是去神秘化账簿作为需要单方面的，专家解释的来源，一个是开放的各种解释的可能性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Management & Organizational History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.