Proximity and knowledge sharing in coworking spaces: The case of São Paulo

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Davi Nakano , Emerson Gomes dos Santos , Ely Mota Lima , Tarek Virani
{"title":"Proximity and knowledge sharing in coworking spaces: The case of São Paulo","authors":"Davi Nakano ,&nbsp;Emerson Gomes dos Santos ,&nbsp;Ely Mota Lima ,&nbsp;Tarek Virani","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper studies proximity and knowledge creation and sharing in coworking spaces, which are currently abundant in large metropolitan areas. Physical and non-physical proximities can have a positive effect on knowledge sharing, as they facilitate communication and the creation of sense of community, but they can also have a detrimental effect as they might dimmish differences that can make knowledge exchange valuable. To investigate the effect of non-physical (or non-spatial) proximities on knowledge creation and sharing within coworking spaces, a questionnaire was applied to users of those spaces in São Paulo, Brazil, the largest metropolitan area in Latin America. Analysis of 45 responses indicates that users can be classified in three profiles according to their view on the effect of proximities on knowledge sharing, and that for some users, exchange is facilitated by social proximity, but it is actually hindered by cognitive proximity. Individuals that enjoy different points of view are also more available to contact and exchange, and thus, cognitive and social diversity actually favour knowledge sharing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 103789"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671852300115X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies proximity and knowledge creation and sharing in coworking spaces, which are currently abundant in large metropolitan areas. Physical and non-physical proximities can have a positive effect on knowledge sharing, as they facilitate communication and the creation of sense of community, but they can also have a detrimental effect as they might dimmish differences that can make knowledge exchange valuable. To investigate the effect of non-physical (or non-spatial) proximities on knowledge creation and sharing within coworking spaces, a questionnaire was applied to users of those spaces in São Paulo, Brazil, the largest metropolitan area in Latin America. Analysis of 45 responses indicates that users can be classified in three profiles according to their view on the effect of proximities on knowledge sharing, and that for some users, exchange is facilitated by social proximity, but it is actually hindered by cognitive proximity. Individuals that enjoy different points of view are also more available to contact and exchange, and thus, cognitive and social diversity actually favour knowledge sharing.

联合办公空间中的邻近性和知识共享:以圣保罗为例
本文研究了目前大都市共享办公空间中大量存在的邻近性和知识创造与共享。物质上和非物质上的接近可以对知识共享产生积极影响,因为它们促进了沟通和社区意识的产生,但它们也可能产生有害影响,因为它们可能会减弱使知识交流有价值的差异。为了调查非物理(或非空间)接近性对共同工作空间中知识创造和共享的影响,我们对拉丁美洲最大的大都市巴西圣保罗的共同工作空间用户进行了问卷调查。对45个回复的分析表明,根据用户对邻近性对知识共享的影响的看法,可以将用户分为三种类型,并且对于一些用户来说,社会邻近性促进了交换,但实际上是认知邻近性阻碍了交换。拥有不同观点的个人也更容易接触和交流,因此,认知和社会多样性实际上有利于知识共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信