Heidegger, Arendt, and the Destruction of Thought: From the Black Notebooks to The Life of the Mind?

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 Arts and Humanities
Alexei G. Zhavoronkov
{"title":"Heidegger, Arendt, and the Destruction of Thought: From the Black Notebooks to The Life of the Mind?","authors":"Alexei G. Zhavoronkov","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.1973316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the issue of Martin Heidegger’s influence on Hannah Arendt as an offshoot of the debates over the Black Notebooks and Heidegger’s attitude toward National Socialism. It centers on a critical analysis of the main arguments of French historian of philosophy Emmanuel Faye, who asserted that Arendt’s views on National Socialism underwent a significant transformation under the influence of Heidegger’s philosophy. I demonstrate the counterproductiveness of Faye’s attempts to apply the most radical arguments from the Heidegger debate to analysis of Arendt’s texts and to inscribe this approach into the broader context of the discussion on race and racism in the works of “classical” philosophers. In the course of my analysis, I also discuss the impact of Faye’s work on contemporary Russian reception of Heidegger’s philosophy and the place his research occupies in contemporary Arendt studies.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"205 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1973316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the issue of Martin Heidegger’s influence on Hannah Arendt as an offshoot of the debates over the Black Notebooks and Heidegger’s attitude toward National Socialism. It centers on a critical analysis of the main arguments of French historian of philosophy Emmanuel Faye, who asserted that Arendt’s views on National Socialism underwent a significant transformation under the influence of Heidegger’s philosophy. I demonstrate the counterproductiveness of Faye’s attempts to apply the most radical arguments from the Heidegger debate to analysis of Arendt’s texts and to inscribe this approach into the broader context of the discussion on race and racism in the works of “classical” philosophers. In the course of my analysis, I also discuss the impact of Faye’s work on contemporary Russian reception of Heidegger’s philosophy and the place his research occupies in contemporary Arendt studies.
海德格尔、阿伦特与思想的毁灭:从《黑色笔记》到《心灵生活》?
本文致力于探讨马丁·海德格尔对汉娜·阿伦特的影响,这是关于《黑色笔记本》和海德格尔对国家社会主义态度争论的一个分支。本文主要对法国哲学史家伊曼纽尔·法耶的主要论点进行了批判性分析,他断言阿伦特的国家社会主义观在海德格尔哲学的影响下发生了重大转变。我展示了费耶试图将海德格尔辩论中最激进的论点应用于分析阿伦特的文本,并将这种方法纳入“古典”哲学家作品中关于种族和种族主义的讨论的更广泛的背景下,这是适得其反的。在我的分析过程中,我还讨论了费耶的工作对当代俄罗斯人接受海德格尔哲学的影响,以及他的研究在当代阿伦特研究中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信