The Validity of an Instrument The Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills About Metabolism

Y. L. Rahmi, Ariska Triana Dewi, Rahmawati Darussyamsu
{"title":"The Validity of an Instrument The Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills About Metabolism","authors":"Y. L. Rahmi, Ariska Triana Dewi, Rahmawati Darussyamsu","doi":"10.22236/j.bes/535828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The test results of the higher-order thinking skills assessment instrument of students at several high schools in West Sumatra obtained an average score of 17.88-35.19 which is still low. One way to overcome students' low level of high-order thinking skills is to develop an instrument for assessing higher-order thinking skills. This study aims to produce a valid, practical, and good quality item assessment instrument of students' high order thinking about metabolic material for class XII SMA / MA. Methods: This study uses a 4-D development model. The subjects of this study were 3 validators and 27 students of class XII SMA. The data collection instrument was a validity questionnaire and a practicality test. Results: The data obtained are logical validation with an average percentage of 84.90% valid criteria, empirical validity with a correlation between 0.27-0.54 with valid criteria. Has an average percentage on practical criteria of 86.64%, reliability 0.83 with high categories Conclusions: Instruments for assessing the ability to think at a high level about metabolic material are logically valid and empirically valid, practical, reliable, moderate difficulty level, distinguishing power and good quality options.","PeriodicalId":33216,"journal":{"name":"Bioeduscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioeduscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22236/j.bes/535828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The test results of the higher-order thinking skills assessment instrument of students at several high schools in West Sumatra obtained an average score of 17.88-35.19 which is still low. One way to overcome students' low level of high-order thinking skills is to develop an instrument for assessing higher-order thinking skills. This study aims to produce a valid, practical, and good quality item assessment instrument of students' high order thinking about metabolic material for class XII SMA / MA. Methods: This study uses a 4-D development model. The subjects of this study were 3 validators and 27 students of class XII SMA. The data collection instrument was a validity questionnaire and a practicality test. Results: The data obtained are logical validation with an average percentage of 84.90% valid criteria, empirical validity with a correlation between 0.27-0.54 with valid criteria. Has an average percentage on practical criteria of 86.64%, reliability 0.83 with high categories Conclusions: Instruments for assessing the ability to think at a high level about metabolic material are logically valid and empirically valid, practical, reliable, moderate difficulty level, distinguishing power and good quality options.
一种工具的效度——新陈代谢高级思维能力的评估
背景:西苏门答腊省几所高中学生的高阶思维技能评估工具的测试结果平均得分为17.88-35.19,仍然很低。克服学生高阶思维能力水平低的一种方法是开发一种评估高阶思维技能的工具。本研究旨在为十二班SMA/MA学生制作一套有效、实用、高质量的代谢材料高阶思维项目评估工具。方法:本研究采用4-D发展模型。本研究的受试者是3名验证者和27名十二年级SMA学生。数据收集工具是一份有效性问卷和一份实用性测试。结果:所获得的数据是逻辑验证,有效标准的平均百分比为84.90%,经验有效性与有效标准的相关性在0.27-0.54之间。在实践标准上的平均百分比为86.64%,高类别的可靠性为0.83结论:用于评估代谢物质高水平思考能力的工具在逻辑上有效,在经验上有效,实用,可靠,中等难度水平,辨别能力和高质量的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信