Efficacy of Gabapentin vs Oxcarbazepine in terms of pain, sleep and quality of life in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Q4 Medicine
Wadha Nawal Zaffer, Faiz Unnisa, Farath Unnisa, Ayesha Tahoora Fatima, Azmath Unnisa Begum, Mohammed Zoheb
{"title":"Efficacy of Gabapentin vs Oxcarbazepine in terms of pain, sleep and quality of life in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy","authors":"Wadha Nawal Zaffer, Faiz Unnisa, Farath Unnisa, Ayesha Tahoora Fatima, Azmath Unnisa Begum, Mohammed Zoheb","doi":"10.37897/rjn.2022.3.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The treatment of peripheral diabetic neuropathy is difficult to treat considering the pain is severe, long-lasting and does not respond to analgesics. Gabapentin has been recommended as the first line treatment for DPN but owing to cognitive dysfunction and other side effects the drug is discontinued. Recent studies suggest that oxcarbazepine; an antiepileptic drug has good-efficacy in management of DPN. This prospective, observational and comparative study was done to compare gabapentin and oxcarbazepine monotherapy in patient of DPN. Objectives. We assessed the efficacy of Oxcarbazepine monotherapy in terms of pain score, sleep score and quality of life and compared with gabapentin monotherapy. Methods. 100 patients with DPN or examinations suggesting DPN were divided into 2 groups to receive gabapentin 300-1200 mg/day or Oxcarbazepine 300-600mg/day. Assessment of pain scores, sleep score and quality of life were done at different duration during the course of therapy. Results. Out of total subject selected, the maximum (46%) subjects were between age group 60-90 years and the least effected were (24%) between age group 50-59 years. Male were more prevalent with 57% when compared to females with 43%. Improvement in Sleep was seen on using Group II with p value (0.0005). However, the correlation of Pain and Quality of life with the treatment shows p –value 0.24, 0.31 and 0.27 respectively showing non-significance. Conclusion. The sleep improved statistically correlated in patients with DPN, but not with quality of life and pain as the calculated p value was (p= 0.24, 0.31 and 0.27) respectively. Findings of this study suggest that oxcarbazepine can be used as an alternative treatment owing to its similar analgesic efficacy and improvement in sleep.","PeriodicalId":37662,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Neurology/ Revista Romana de Neurologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Neurology/ Revista Romana de Neurologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjn.2022.3.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The treatment of peripheral diabetic neuropathy is difficult to treat considering the pain is severe, long-lasting and does not respond to analgesics. Gabapentin has been recommended as the first line treatment for DPN but owing to cognitive dysfunction and other side effects the drug is discontinued. Recent studies suggest that oxcarbazepine; an antiepileptic drug has good-efficacy in management of DPN. This prospective, observational and comparative study was done to compare gabapentin and oxcarbazepine monotherapy in patient of DPN. Objectives. We assessed the efficacy of Oxcarbazepine monotherapy in terms of pain score, sleep score and quality of life and compared with gabapentin monotherapy. Methods. 100 patients with DPN or examinations suggesting DPN were divided into 2 groups to receive gabapentin 300-1200 mg/day or Oxcarbazepine 300-600mg/day. Assessment of pain scores, sleep score and quality of life were done at different duration during the course of therapy. Results. Out of total subject selected, the maximum (46%) subjects were between age group 60-90 years and the least effected were (24%) between age group 50-59 years. Male were more prevalent with 57% when compared to females with 43%. Improvement in Sleep was seen on using Group II with p value (0.0005). However, the correlation of Pain and Quality of life with the treatment shows p –value 0.24, 0.31 and 0.27 respectively showing non-significance. Conclusion. The sleep improved statistically correlated in patients with DPN, but not with quality of life and pain as the calculated p value was (p= 0.24, 0.31 and 0.27) respectively. Findings of this study suggest that oxcarbazepine can be used as an alternative treatment owing to its similar analgesic efficacy and improvement in sleep.
加巴喷丁与奥卡西平对糖尿病周围神经病变患者疼痛、睡眠和生活质量的疗效
背景考虑到周围糖尿病神经病变的疼痛严重、持久且对止痛药没有反应,因此治疗很困难。加巴喷丁已被推荐为DPN的一线治疗药物,但由于认知功能障碍和其他副作用,该药物已停用。最近的研究表明,奥卡西平;一种抗癫痫药物在DPN的治疗中具有良好的疗效。这项前瞻性、观察性和比较性研究是为了比较加巴喷丁和奥卡西平单药治疗DPN患者。目标。我们从疼痛评分、睡眠评分和生活质量方面评估了奥卡西平单药治疗的疗效,并与加巴喷丁单药治疗进行了比较。方法。将100例DPN或检查提示DPN的患者分为两组,分别接受加巴喷丁300-1200 mg/天或奥卡西平300-600 mg/天。在治疗过程中,在不同的持续时间对疼痛评分、睡眠评分和生活质量进行评估。后果在所选的受试者总数中,最大(46%)受试者年龄在60-90岁之间,受试者影响最小(24%)年龄在50-59岁之间。男性的患病率为57%,而女性为43%。第二组的睡眠改善,p值为(0.0005)。然而,疼痛和生活质量与治疗的相关性分别为p值0.24、0.31和0.27,无显著性。结论DPN患者的睡眠改善具有统计学相关性,但与生活质量和疼痛无关,因为计算的p值分别为(p=0.24、0.31和0.27)。这项研究的结果表明,奥卡西平可以作为一种替代治疗方法,因为它具有类似的镇痛效果和改善睡眠的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY (Revista Română de Neurologie), the official journal of the Romanian Society of Neurology, was founded in 2001, being a prestigious scientific journal that provides a high quality in terms of scientific content, but also the editorial and graphic aspect, both through an impartial process of selection, evaluation and correction of articles (peer review procedure), as well as providing editorial, graphic and printing conditions at the highest level. In order to increase the scientific standards of the journal, special attention was paid to the improvement of the quality of the published materials. Guidance articles, clinical trials and case studies are structured in several sections: reviews, original articles, case reports, images in neurology. All articles are published entirely in English. A team of reputable medical professionals in the field of neurology is involved in a rigorous peer review process that complies with international ethics and quality rules in the academic world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信