Letter to the Editor-in-Chief of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety

Q2 Social Sciences
L. Bellamy
{"title":"Letter to the Editor-in-Chief of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","authors":"L. Bellamy","doi":"10.1080/14773996.2019.1600307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sir, I am writing this letter at the invitation of Taylor and Francis to correct a misrepresentation of my views and a misleading conclusion with respect to my published work (Bellamy, 2015) on an analysis of occupational accidents from the Storybuilder database of the National Institute of Public Health & the Environment (RIVM) in The Netherlands. In 2017, a special issue of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety appeared in which the ‘Vision Zero’ concept of occupational safety was addressed by a small group of authors under the editorship of Patrick Waterson (Waterson, 2017). Amongst the authors was Sidney Dekker who wrote a critical paper on the Vision Zero concept (Dekker, 2017). There are three aspects of this paper that I wish to contest. The first involves a quote, the second involves an incorrect statement about my relationship to the analysis of the original data, and the third is about what my research allegedly shows and hence the position I am taking. This published paper by Dekker takes a quote from a paper by me in Safety Science (Bellamy, 2015) out of context. Dekker starts in the middle of my sentence but uses a capital letter, thereby creating the illusion that I started the sentence there. The text in the quote is actually my description of someone else’s model but Dekker presents it in such a way as to suggest this is my point of view. On p.4 he says (Dekker, 2017):","PeriodicalId":43946,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2019.1600307","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2019.1600307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sir, I am writing this letter at the invitation of Taylor and Francis to correct a misrepresentation of my views and a misleading conclusion with respect to my published work (Bellamy, 2015) on an analysis of occupational accidents from the Storybuilder database of the National Institute of Public Health & the Environment (RIVM) in The Netherlands. In 2017, a special issue of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety appeared in which the ‘Vision Zero’ concept of occupational safety was addressed by a small group of authors under the editorship of Patrick Waterson (Waterson, 2017). Amongst the authors was Sidney Dekker who wrote a critical paper on the Vision Zero concept (Dekker, 2017). There are three aspects of this paper that I wish to contest. The first involves a quote, the second involves an incorrect statement about my relationship to the analysis of the original data, and the third is about what my research allegedly shows and hence the position I am taking. This published paper by Dekker takes a quote from a paper by me in Safety Science (Bellamy, 2015) out of context. Dekker starts in the middle of my sentence but uses a capital letter, thereby creating the illusion that I started the sentence there. The text in the quote is actually my description of someone else’s model but Dekker presents it in such a way as to suggest this is my point of view. On p.4 he says (Dekker, 2017):
致《健康与安全政策与实践》主编的信
先生,我是应Taylor和Francis的邀请写这封信的,目的是纠正我对荷兰国家公共卫生与环境研究所(RIVM)Storybuilder数据库中职业事故分析发表的工作(Bellamy,2015)的错误陈述和误导性结论。2017年,《健康与安全政策与实践》特刊出版,其中一小群作者在Patrick Waterson的编辑下提出了职业安全的“零愿景”概念(Waterson,2017)。Sidney Dekker是作者之一,他写了一篇关于零视觉概念的批评性论文(Dekker,2017)。我想对这篇论文的三个方面提出质疑。第一个涉及引用,第二个涉及关于我与原始数据分析的关系的错误陈述,第三个是关于我的研究所显示的内容,以及我所采取的立场。Dekker发表的这篇论文断章取义地引用了我在《安全科学》(Bellamy,2015)上的一篇论文。德克尔在我的句子中间开始,但使用了一个大写字母,从而产生了我在那里开始句子的幻觉。引用中的文字实际上是我对他人模型的描述,但德克尔的表述方式表明这是我的观点。在第4页,他说(Dekker,2017):
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信