Actor-Networking European Union Mental Health Governance, 1999-2019

IF 1.1 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Kristin Edquist
{"title":"Actor-Networking European Union Mental Health Governance, 1999-2019","authors":"Kristin Edquist","doi":"10.30950/jcer.v18i1.1175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past three decades, processes of assessing and governing mental healthcare have emerged at the European Union level. Consisting almost entirely of ‘soft law’ instruments, EU mental health governance (EUMHG) has incorporated policy-makers, mental healthcare providers, research scientists, non-governmental organizations, and patients and families across Europe in processes of mental health governance. This paper explores the role of the European Commission in EUMHG. It proposes that recent attempts to theorise the Commission’s role in European integration over-emphasise EU-level institutional relations and thus neglect the knowledge relations that are central to policy areas such as mental health. It therefore adopts an analytic framework based on Actor Network Theory that enables more accurate understanding of those relations. Applying this framework to EUMHG over time, it identifies three distinct networks that have emerged in EUMHG, all built via Commission initiatives. This analysis reveals the Commission’s central but not independent role in EUMHG’s survival, and illustrates how different kinds of actors held ‘expert’ roles in EUMHG depending on the way in mental (ill) health was problematised in EUMHG. The paper therefore suggests a new concern regarding the nature of ‘soft’ EU law, namely, its influence on knowledge and authority in transnationally constructed policy.","PeriodicalId":44985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v18i1.1175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past three decades, processes of assessing and governing mental healthcare have emerged at the European Union level. Consisting almost entirely of ‘soft law’ instruments, EU mental health governance (EUMHG) has incorporated policy-makers, mental healthcare providers, research scientists, non-governmental organizations, and patients and families across Europe in processes of mental health governance. This paper explores the role of the European Commission in EUMHG. It proposes that recent attempts to theorise the Commission’s role in European integration over-emphasise EU-level institutional relations and thus neglect the knowledge relations that are central to policy areas such as mental health. It therefore adopts an analytic framework based on Actor Network Theory that enables more accurate understanding of those relations. Applying this framework to EUMHG over time, it identifies three distinct networks that have emerged in EUMHG, all built via Commission initiatives. This analysis reveals the Commission’s central but not independent role in EUMHG’s survival, and illustrates how different kinds of actors held ‘expert’ roles in EUMHG depending on the way in mental (ill) health was problematised in EUMHG. The paper therefore suggests a new concern regarding the nature of ‘soft’ EU law, namely, its influence on knowledge and authority in transnationally constructed policy.
行动者网络欧洲联盟精神卫生治理,1999-2019年
在过去三十年中,在欧洲联盟一级出现了评估和管理精神保健的进程。欧盟精神卫生治理(EUMHG)几乎完全由“软法律”文书组成,将欧洲各地的政策制定者、精神卫生保健提供者、研究科学家、非政府组织以及患者和家属纳入了精神卫生治理进程。本文探讨了欧盟委员会在euumhg中的作用。它提出,最近试图将欧盟委员会在欧洲一体化中的作用理论化的尝试过分强调了欧盟层面的制度关系,从而忽视了对心理健康等政策领域至关重要的知识关系。因此,本文采用了基于行动者网络理论的分析框架,可以更准确地理解这些关系。随着时间的推移,将这一框架应用于欧盟汞柱,它确定了欧盟汞柱中出现的三个不同的网络,这些网络都是通过欧盟委员会的倡议建立的。这一分析揭示了委员会在联危治疗中发挥的核心但非独立的作用,并说明了不同类型的行动者如何根据联危治疗中出现精神(疾病)健康问题的方式在联危治疗中发挥"专家"作用。因此,本文提出了一个关于“软”欧盟法律性质的新问题,即它对跨国构建政策中的知识和权威的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信