Comparison of Quality of Sibling Relationship between Mentally Challenged Children and Normal Siblings across Birth Order and Gender
Q2 Social Sciences
Ritu Singh
求助PDF
{"title":"Comparison of Quality of Sibling Relationship between Mentally Challenged Children and Normal Siblings across Birth Order and Gender","authors":"Ritu Singh","doi":"10.31901/24566772.2019/13.04.577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper examines the difference in the quality of sibling relationship between mentally challenged children and their normal siblings across birth order and gender. Responses of a total of 343 respondents involving one (any) mentally normal elder sibling (n1=122) and one (any) mentally normal younger sibling (n2=71) and (any) parent of the mentally challenged children (n3=150) were analyzed for assessing quality of sibling relationship across birth order. Whereas, responses of a total of 210 respondents involving one (any) mentally normal male sibling (n1=70) and one (any) mentally normal female sibling (n2=70) and (any) parent of the mentally challenged children (n3=70) were analyzed for assessing quality of sibling relationship across gender. Sibling Relationship Scale was administered to assess the quality of sibling relationship between mentally challenged children and their mentally normal siblings. In the present study, analysis across birth order reflected no significant difference on any component of sibling relationship between mentally challenged children and their mentally normal elder or younger sibling. On the contrary, analysis across gender depicted significantly higher overall warmth/ closeness, nurturance and dominance between mentally challenged and mentally normal same-sex siblings than mentally challenged and mentally normal opposite sex siblings. However, no significant gender difference was seen on the components of conflict and rivalry of sibling relationship between mentally challenged children and their mentally normal siblings. Address for correspondence: Dr Ritu Singh Associate Professor Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, G.B.P.U.A.T., Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India E-mail: ritu.singh07@gmail.com INTRODUCTION According to the family systems theory, family is a complex interactive social system in which each experience within family affects every member and components of the system continually change to keep it in balance. Within the family, there are three central subsystems: the spousal, parental, and sibling subsystems. These three subsystems have their own unique features like spousal subsystem provides companionship and loyalty to the married partners; parental subsystem encompasses helping children build and refine their knowledge and skills, as well as their learning expectations, beliefs, goals and coping strategies and sibling subsystem gives the first experience of peer relationship in one’s life, that is, provides fertile arena for comforting, sharing and helping (Hughes et al. 2018). Besides this, theory propounds that individuals can’t be understood as separate entities, but rather in whole as a family since they are enveloped with an emotional bond. Occurrence of any non-normative life event in the family adversely affects family as a unit and consequently interactions amongst members in different subsystems get modified and reorganized to achieve equilibrium between subsystems. Thus, we can say that any unfavorable life event disturbs the balance of family life equation. Birth of a child with mental health deficits is one such non normative life event. Mental challenge is a condition of mental deficiency, a state of incomplete simultaneous development in all domains of development of such a kind and degree that the individual is incapable of adjustments and adaptations to the normal environment in such a way so as to maintain existence independently. Thus, birth of a mentally challenged child demands constant modification of interaction strategies within family subsystems, restructuring of family resources and many more transformations in the family dynamics throughout life span. Foremost, the marital subsystem gets affected with it since the mentally chalEthno Med, 13(4): 198-206 (2019) DOI: 10.31901/24566772.2019/13.04.577 © Kamla-Raj 2019 PRINT: ISSN 0973-5070 ONLINE: ISSN 2456-6772 MENTALLY CHALLENGED ACROSS BIRTH ORDER AND GENDER 199 Ethno Med, 13(4): 198-206 (2019) lenged child triggers a range of emotional responses among spouses concerning the child which may lead to differing opinions among them. Besides this, spouses have to devote exceptionally more time in upbringing of the mentally challenged children which many a times steals away their personal time as husband and wife. It also affects the parent-child relationship between parents and other normal children of the family since parents have to give more care and attention to the special child with the expectation that normal child shall understand this and adjust to the so called differential treatment. Thus, the presence of a mentally challenged child many times is a stress source for family (Jefferson 2007) and affects deeply on siblings’ relationships. The normal sibling may develop atypical patterns of behavior in the presence of mentally challenged sibling for varied reasons, such as, seeking attention of the parents, financial issues due to limited resources, emotional stress, which sometimes may also lead them to disassociate from the sibling. A finding of a 20 year systematic review states that the siblings of children with mental health problems scored in borderline/ clinical range compared to children of general population. Particular areas of functional impairments identified were delinquent behavior, somatic complaints, anxious/ depressed behavior, and social problems (Ma et al. 2017). Studies of Abu-Ajaj (2012) have shown that brothers and sisters of disabled children are at compatibility problems and have low selfesteem than nondisabled children. According to Shivers and Plavnick (2015) youths who recognize their role in their ASD Siblings’ adjustment may develop feelings of warmth, a sense of efficacy, and inclinations for involvement over the longer term. Sibling relationships obtain additional significance in families with children with disabilities, due to advocacy role that siblings take for their brother or sister with special needs (Barr et al. 2008). Barclay and Kolk (2017) reported that the commonly observed pattern that later-borns achieve lower than earlier-born siblings persists. Researchers have tried to explore the impact of presence of disabled children on sibling relationship or on the personality of normal sibling. Upreti and Singh (2016) in their study reported that children irrespective of their degree of mental challenge, who were 3rd or above born were seen to be significantly more adaptive in motor skills, activities of daily living, and prevocational money domains; had better language, reading-writing, number-time and domestic social adaptivity. Volkom et al. (2017) in their study reported that although there was no significant sex difference in how emotionally close respondents felt to their siblings, there was a significant main effect of birth order on perceptions of emotional closeness and that the oldest children felt closer emotionally to their siblings versus youngest children. Gender has been found to play a significant role in the amount of support provided between siblings, with sisters being most likely to provide both emotional and practical support (Wallace 2012). Another study by Soysal (2016) reveals that gender leads to significant differences in life satisfaction, level of loneliness and sibling relationships. However, a study by Tucker et al. (2001) reported that when researchers asked siblings about shared daily activities, children mentioned that older siblings often helped younger siblings with academic and peer challenges. Thus, it can be stated that birth order effects on sibling relationships of children still remains uncertain with the impact of child’s birth order on the sibling relationship of mentally challenged children not being completely revealed. Thus, present study has been taken up with the following objectives:","PeriodicalId":39279,"journal":{"name":"Studies on Ethno-Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies on Ethno-Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31901/24566772.2019/13.04.577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
引用
批量引用
Abstract
The present paper examines the difference in the quality of sibling relationship between mentally challenged children and their normal siblings across birth order and gender. Responses of a total of 343 respondents involving one (any) mentally normal elder sibling (n1=122) and one (any) mentally normal younger sibling (n2=71) and (any) parent of the mentally challenged children (n3=150) were analyzed for assessing quality of sibling relationship across birth order. Whereas, responses of a total of 210 respondents involving one (any) mentally normal male sibling (n1=70) and one (any) mentally normal female sibling (n2=70) and (any) parent of the mentally challenged children (n3=70) were analyzed for assessing quality of sibling relationship across gender. Sibling Relationship Scale was administered to assess the quality of sibling relationship between mentally challenged children and their mentally normal siblings. In the present study, analysis across birth order reflected no significant difference on any component of sibling relationship between mentally challenged children and their mentally normal elder or younger sibling. On the contrary, analysis across gender depicted significantly higher overall warmth/ closeness, nurturance and dominance between mentally challenged and mentally normal same-sex siblings than mentally challenged and mentally normal opposite sex siblings. However, no significant gender difference was seen on the components of conflict and rivalry of sibling relationship between mentally challenged children and their mentally normal siblings. Address for correspondence: Dr Ritu Singh Associate Professor Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, G.B.P.U.A.T., Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India E-mail: ritu.singh07@gmail.com INTRODUCTION According to the family systems theory, family is a complex interactive social system in which each experience within family affects every member and components of the system continually change to keep it in balance. Within the family, there are three central subsystems: the spousal, parental, and sibling subsystems. These three subsystems have their own unique features like spousal subsystem provides companionship and loyalty to the married partners; parental subsystem encompasses helping children build and refine their knowledge and skills, as well as their learning expectations, beliefs, goals and coping strategies and sibling subsystem gives the first experience of peer relationship in one’s life, that is, provides fertile arena for comforting, sharing and helping (Hughes et al. 2018). Besides this, theory propounds that individuals can’t be understood as separate entities, but rather in whole as a family since they are enveloped with an emotional bond. Occurrence of any non-normative life event in the family adversely affects family as a unit and consequently interactions amongst members in different subsystems get modified and reorganized to achieve equilibrium between subsystems. Thus, we can say that any unfavorable life event disturbs the balance of family life equation. Birth of a child with mental health deficits is one such non normative life event. Mental challenge is a condition of mental deficiency, a state of incomplete simultaneous development in all domains of development of such a kind and degree that the individual is incapable of adjustments and adaptations to the normal environment in such a way so as to maintain existence independently. Thus, birth of a mentally challenged child demands constant modification of interaction strategies within family subsystems, restructuring of family resources and many more transformations in the family dynamics throughout life span. Foremost, the marital subsystem gets affected with it since the mentally chalEthno Med, 13(4): 198-206 (2019) DOI: 10.31901/24566772.2019/13.04.577 © Kamla-Raj 2019 PRINT: ISSN 0973-5070 ONLINE: ISSN 2456-6772 MENTALLY CHALLENGED ACROSS BIRTH ORDER AND GENDER 199 Ethno Med, 13(4): 198-206 (2019) lenged child triggers a range of emotional responses among spouses concerning the child which may lead to differing opinions among them. Besides this, spouses have to devote exceptionally more time in upbringing of the mentally challenged children which many a times steals away their personal time as husband and wife. It also affects the parent-child relationship between parents and other normal children of the family since parents have to give more care and attention to the special child with the expectation that normal child shall understand this and adjust to the so called differential treatment. Thus, the presence of a mentally challenged child many times is a stress source for family (Jefferson 2007) and affects deeply on siblings’ relationships. The normal sibling may develop atypical patterns of behavior in the presence of mentally challenged sibling for varied reasons, such as, seeking attention of the parents, financial issues due to limited resources, emotional stress, which sometimes may also lead them to disassociate from the sibling. A finding of a 20 year systematic review states that the siblings of children with mental health problems scored in borderline/ clinical range compared to children of general population. Particular areas of functional impairments identified were delinquent behavior, somatic complaints, anxious/ depressed behavior, and social problems (Ma et al. 2017). Studies of Abu-Ajaj (2012) have shown that brothers and sisters of disabled children are at compatibility problems and have low selfesteem than nondisabled children. According to Shivers and Plavnick (2015) youths who recognize their role in their ASD Siblings’ adjustment may develop feelings of warmth, a sense of efficacy, and inclinations for involvement over the longer term. Sibling relationships obtain additional significance in families with children with disabilities, due to advocacy role that siblings take for their brother or sister with special needs (Barr et al. 2008). Barclay and Kolk (2017) reported that the commonly observed pattern that later-borns achieve lower than earlier-born siblings persists. Researchers have tried to explore the impact of presence of disabled children on sibling relationship or on the personality of normal sibling. Upreti and Singh (2016) in their study reported that children irrespective of their degree of mental challenge, who were 3rd or above born were seen to be significantly more adaptive in motor skills, activities of daily living, and prevocational money domains; had better language, reading-writing, number-time and domestic social adaptivity. Volkom et al. (2017) in their study reported that although there was no significant sex difference in how emotionally close respondents felt to their siblings, there was a significant main effect of birth order on perceptions of emotional closeness and that the oldest children felt closer emotionally to their siblings versus youngest children. Gender has been found to play a significant role in the amount of support provided between siblings, with sisters being most likely to provide both emotional and practical support (Wallace 2012). Another study by Soysal (2016) reveals that gender leads to significant differences in life satisfaction, level of loneliness and sibling relationships. However, a study by Tucker et al. (2001) reported that when researchers asked siblings about shared daily activities, children mentioned that older siblings often helped younger siblings with academic and peer challenges. Thus, it can be stated that birth order effects on sibling relationships of children still remains uncertain with the impact of child’s birth order on the sibling relationship of mentally challenged children not being completely revealed. Thus, present study has been taken up with the following objectives:
不同出生顺序和性别的智障儿童与正常兄弟姐妹关系质量比较
本论文探讨了智力障碍儿童和他们的正常兄弟姐妹在出生顺序和性别之间的兄弟姐妹关系质量的差异。分析了343名受访者的回答,其中包括一个(任何)智力正常的兄长(n1=122)和一个(任何)智力正常的弟弟妹妹(n2=71)以及智力障碍儿童的(任何)父母(n3=150),以评估出生顺序中兄弟姐妹关系的质量。然而,我们分析了210名被调查者的回答,其中包括一个(任何)精神正常的男性兄弟姐妹(n1=70)和一个(任何)精神正常的女性兄弟姐妹(n2=70)以及智力障碍儿童的(任何)父母(n3=70),以评估跨性别兄弟姐妹关系的质量。采用手足关系量表评估智障儿童与智障儿童的手足关系质量。在本研究中,通过对出生顺序的分析,智力障碍儿童与智力正常的哥哥妹妹之间的兄弟姐妹关系的任何组成部分都没有显著差异。相反,跨性别分析显示,智力障碍和智力正常的同性兄弟姐妹之间的总体温暖/亲密程度、养育和支配地位显著高于智力障碍和智力正常的异性兄弟姐妹。然而,智力障碍儿童与智力正常儿童在兄弟姐妹关系的冲突和竞争成分上没有显著的性别差异。通信地址:Ritu Singh博士副教授,印度北阿坎德邦潘纳格尔g.b.p.u.a.t.家庭科学学院人类发展与家庭研究系E-mail: ritu.singh07@gmail.com简介根据家庭系统理论,家庭是一个复杂的互动社会系统,其中家庭中的每种经历都会影响到每个成员,并且系统的组成部分不断变化以保持平衡。在家庭中,有三个中心子系统:配偶、父母和兄弟姐妹子系统。这三个子系统各有特色:配偶子系统为已婚伴侣提供陪伴和忠诚;父母子系统包括帮助孩子建立和完善他们的知识和技能,以及他们的学习期望、信念、目标和应对策略,兄弟姐妹子系统提供了人生中第一次同伴关系的体验,也就是说,为安慰、分享和帮助提供了丰富的舞台(Hughes et al. 2018)。除此之外,理论提出,个体不能被理解为独立的实体,而是作为一个整体,因为他们被情感纽带所包围。家庭中任何不规范的生活事件的发生都会对家庭这个整体产生不利影响,从而使不同子系统成员之间的相互作用得到调整和重组,以达到子系统之间的平衡。因此,我们可以说任何不利的生活事件都会扰乱家庭生活平衡。一个有心理健康缺陷的孩子的出生就是这样一个不规范的生活事件。精神挑战是一种精神缺陷的状态,是一种在所有发展领域中不完全同时发展的状态,这种发展的种类和程度使个体无法以这种方式调整和适应正常环境以保持独立存在。因此,一个智障儿童的出生需要不断修改家庭子系统内的互动策略,重新调整家庭资源,以及在整个生命周期中家庭动态的更多变化。最重要的是,婚姻子系统受到它的影响,因为精神上的挑战Ethno Med, 13(4): 198-206 (2019) DOI: 10.31901/24566772.2019/13.04.577©Kamla-Raj 2019 PRINT: ISSN 0973-5070 ONLINE: ISSN 2456-6772跨越出生顺序和性别的精神挑战199 Ethno Med, 13(4): 198-206(2019)长孩子引发了配偶之间关于孩子的一系列情绪反应,这可能导致他们之间的不同意见。除此之外,夫妻还必须花更多的时间来养育有智力障碍的孩子,这常常占用了他们作为夫妻的私人时间。这也影响了父母与家庭中其他正常孩子之间的亲子关系,因为父母必须给予特殊孩子更多的关心和关注,期望正常孩子能够理解这一点并适应所谓的差别待遇。因此,智障儿童的存在多次成为家庭的压力来源(Jefferson 2007),并深刻影响兄弟姐妹的关系。 正常的兄弟姐妹在有智障兄弟姐妹的情况下可能会因为各种原因出现非典型的行为模式,比如寻求父母的关注,由于资源有限而导致的经济问题,情感压力,有时也可能导致他们与兄弟姐妹脱离关系。一项为期20年的系统回顾发现,与一般人群的儿童相比,有精神健康问题的儿童的兄弟姐妹得分在边缘/临床范围内。确定的功能障碍的特定领域是犯罪行为、躯体抱怨、焦虑/抑郁行为和社会问题(Ma et al. 2017)。Abu-Ajaj(2012)的研究表明,残疾儿童的兄弟姐妹比非残疾儿童存在兼容性问题,自尊心较低。根据Shivers和Plavnick(2015)的研究,认识到自己在ASD兄弟姐妹适应过程中所扮演角色的青少年,可能会在较长时间内产生温暖感、效能感和参与倾向。兄弟姐妹关系在有残疾儿童的家庭中具有额外的意义,因为兄弟姐妹为有特殊需要的兄弟姐妹提供支持(Barr et al. 2008)。Barclay和Kolk(2017)报告说,通常观察到的模式是,晚出生的孩子比早出生的兄弟姐妹成绩低。研究人员试图探索残疾儿童的存在对兄弟姐妹关系或正常兄弟姐妹性格的影响。Upreti和Singh(2016)在他们的研究中报告说,无论他们的智力挑战程度如何,三岁或三岁以上出生的孩子在运动技能、日常生活活动和职业前金钱领域的适应性都要强得多;有较好的语言、读写、数字时间和家庭社会适应能力。Volkom等人(2017)在他们的研究中报告说,尽管受访者对兄弟姐妹的情感亲密程度没有显著的性别差异,但出生顺序对情感亲密度的感知有显著的主要影响,最大的孩子比最小的孩子在情感上更接近他们的兄弟姐妹。性别在兄弟姐妹之间提供的支持数量中起着重要作用,姐妹最有可能提供情感和实际支持(Wallace 2012)。Soysal(2016)的另一项研究表明,性别会导致生活满意度、孤独程度和兄弟姐妹关系的显著差异。然而,塔克等人(2001)的一项研究报告称,当研究人员询问兄弟姐妹共同的日常活动时,孩子们提到哥哥姐姐经常帮助弟弟妹妹解决学业和同伴挑战。因此,出生顺序对儿童兄弟姐妹关系的影响仍然不确定,儿童出生顺序对智障儿童兄弟姐妹关系的影响尚未完全揭示。因此,本研究的目的如下:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
来源期刊
期刊介绍:
Studies on Ethno-Medicine is a peer reviewed, internationally circulated journal. It publishes reports of original research, theoretical articles, timely reviews, brief communications, book reviews and other publications in the interdisciplinary field of ethno-medicine. The journal serves as a forum for physical, social and life scientists as well as for health professionals. The transdisciplinary areas covered by this journal include, but are not limited to, Physical Sciences, Anthropology, Sociology, Geography, Life Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Botany, Agriculture, Home Science, Zoology, Genetics, Biology, Medical Sciences, Public Health, Demography and Epidemiology. The journal publishes basic, applied and methodologically oriented research from all such areas. The journal is committed to prompt review, and priority publication is given to manuscripts with novel or timely findings, and to manuscript of unusual interest. Further, the manuscripts are categorised under three types, namely - Regular articles, Short Communications and Reviews. The researchers are invited to submit original papers in English (papers published elsewhere or under consideration elsewhere shall not be considered).