The Effects of Fresh Gas Flow on Emergence Agitation for Gynecologic Surgery: A Clinical Study

Q4 Medicine
A. Tas Tuna, Gürkan Demir, H. Kocayiğit, A. F. Erdem
{"title":"The Effects of Fresh Gas Flow on Emergence Agitation for Gynecologic Surgery: A Clinical Study","authors":"A. Tas Tuna, Gürkan Demir, H. Kocayiğit, A. F. Erdem","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2022.71677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: This prospective study aimed to determine whether low flow anesthesia (LFA) has an effect on emergence agitation in women who underwent laparotomic gynecologic surgeries. Method: Sixty four female patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 2 and Group 0.5. The fresh gas flow (FGF) rate was set at 4 L min-1 in both groups, initially. When all patients reached 1 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane, the FGF rate was reduced to 2 L min-1 in Group 2 and 0.5 L min-1 in Group 0.5. For Group 0.5, vapor was closed 15 minutes before the end of surgery, while it was closed at the end of the operation for Group 2. At the end of the surgery, the FGF rate was increased to 4 L min-1. Emergence agitation was assessed using the Riker Sedation Agitation Scale (SAS) in the post-anesthesia care unit at 5, 10, 20 and 30th minutes. Results: Emergence agitation was observed in 5 patients, no significant difference was found between two groups. For all evaluation times, number of patients with SAS=4 was significantly higher in Group 0.5, while the number of patients with SAS<4 was significantly higher in Group 2 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The number of patients who are calm and cooperative was higher in LFA. Keywords: Emergence agitation, general anesthesia, fresh gas flow","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2022.71677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This prospective study aimed to determine whether low flow anesthesia (LFA) has an effect on emergence agitation in women who underwent laparotomic gynecologic surgeries. Method: Sixty four female patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 2 and Group 0.5. The fresh gas flow (FGF) rate was set at 4 L min-1 in both groups, initially. When all patients reached 1 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane, the FGF rate was reduced to 2 L min-1 in Group 2 and 0.5 L min-1 in Group 0.5. For Group 0.5, vapor was closed 15 minutes before the end of surgery, while it was closed at the end of the operation for Group 2. At the end of the surgery, the FGF rate was increased to 4 L min-1. Emergence agitation was assessed using the Riker Sedation Agitation Scale (SAS) in the post-anesthesia care unit at 5, 10, 20 and 30th minutes. Results: Emergence agitation was observed in 5 patients, no significant difference was found between two groups. For all evaluation times, number of patients with SAS=4 was significantly higher in Group 0.5, while the number of patients with SAS<4 was significantly higher in Group 2 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The number of patients who are calm and cooperative was higher in LFA. Keywords: Emergence agitation, general anesthesia, fresh gas flow
新鲜气流对妇科手术急诊激动作用的临床研究
摘要目的:本前瞻性研究旨在确定低流量麻醉(LFA)是否对接受妇科剖腹产手术的女性出现躁动有影响。方法:64名女性患者被纳入这项前瞻性随机研究。患者被随机分为两组:第2组和第0.5组。两组的新鲜气体流量(FGF)最初设定为4L min-1。当所有患者的七氟醚肺泡最低浓度达到1时,FGF率在第2组降至2L min-1,在第0.5组降至0.5L min-1。对于0.5组,蒸汽在手术结束前15分钟关闭,而对于2组,蒸汽则在手术结束时关闭。在手术结束时,FGF率增加到4L min-1。在麻醉后护理室中,使用Riker镇静激动量表(SAS)在5、10、20和30分钟时评估紧急激动。结果:5例患者出现紧急躁动,两组比较无显著性差异。在所有评估时间中,0.5组SAS=4的患者数量显著高于2组SAS<4的患者数量(p<0.05)。关键词:急诊搅动、全身麻醉、新鲜气流
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信