Latent mean differences between men and women: The case of the Preference for the Intuition and Deliberation Scale

A. C. Cosentino, S. Azzollini
{"title":"Latent mean differences between men and women: The case of the Preference for the Intuition and Deliberation Scale","authors":"A. C. Cosentino, S. Azzollini","doi":"10.17575/psicologia.1792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intuition and deliberation are two modes of thinking for decision making. The objective of this research was to compare latent means between men and women’s preference for intuition and deliberation. However, empirical studies on the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation scale (PID) measurement invariance were not available. The results of our study showed the original PID-based model did not show a good fit to the data. Nevertheless, a revised PID-based model showed strong and strict measurement invariance. As a result, latent mean comparison indicated that women showed more preference for intuition and less for deliberation than men.","PeriodicalId":37656,"journal":{"name":"PSICOLOGIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSICOLOGIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.1792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Intuition and deliberation are two modes of thinking for decision making. The objective of this research was to compare latent means between men and women’s preference for intuition and deliberation. However, empirical studies on the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation scale (PID) measurement invariance were not available. The results of our study showed the original PID-based model did not show a good fit to the data. Nevertheless, a revised PID-based model showed strong and strict measurement invariance. As a result, latent mean comparison indicated that women showed more preference for intuition and less for deliberation than men.
男性和女性之间的潜在均值差异:对直觉和深思熟虑量表的偏好
直觉和深思熟虑是决策的两种思维方式。本研究的目的是比较男性和女性对直觉和深思熟虑的偏好之间的潜在手段。然而,关于直觉偏好和深思熟虑量表(PID)测量不变性的实证研究尚不可用。我们的研究结果表明,原始的基于PID的模型并没有显示出与数据的良好拟合。然而,基于PID的修正模型显示出强大而严格的测量不变性。结果,潜在均值比较表明,女性比男性更倾向于直觉,而不太倾向于深思熟虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PSICOLOGIA
PSICOLOGIA Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The journal PSICOLOGIA publishes original research in the general scope of psychology and behavioral sciences. PSICOLOGIA welcomes empirical research contributions and literature revisions within specific scientific areas of Psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信