Interpersonal Relationships in the 1996–1997 Japanese Embassy Hostage Crisis in Peru: A View from Relational Development Theory

IF 1.1 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
A. Nguyen, Jonathan Matusitz
{"title":"Interpersonal Relationships in the 1996–1997 Japanese Embassy Hostage Crisis in Peru: A View from Relational Development Theory","authors":"A. Nguyen, Jonathan Matusitz","doi":"10.1080/19361610.2021.1908102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper applies relational development theory to the Japanese embassy hostage crisis that took place in Lima, Peru (from December 1996 to April 1997). During the hostage crisis, members of the Túpac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (MRTA), a Peruvian terrorist organization, stormed the Japanese embassy in Lima and took hundreds of people hostage. They presented their demands to the Peruvian government in exchange for the safety of the hostages. Developed by Mark L. Knapp, the theory describes how interactants—e.g., couples, negotiators, and so forth—go through relationship stages to strengthen their interpersonal communication or social bond. In this conceptual analysis, two important relationships are explored: (1) The relationship between the MRTA and the hostages and (2) the relationship between the MRTA and the Peruvian government (including President Fujimori). Overall, the authors of this analysis found that the MRTA-hostage relationship was ultimately more favorable than the Fujimori-MRTA relationship.","PeriodicalId":44585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Security Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19361610.2021.1908102","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Security Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.1908102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This paper applies relational development theory to the Japanese embassy hostage crisis that took place in Lima, Peru (from December 1996 to April 1997). During the hostage crisis, members of the Túpac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (MRTA), a Peruvian terrorist organization, stormed the Japanese embassy in Lima and took hundreds of people hostage. They presented their demands to the Peruvian government in exchange for the safety of the hostages. Developed by Mark L. Knapp, the theory describes how interactants—e.g., couples, negotiators, and so forth—go through relationship stages to strengthen their interpersonal communication or social bond. In this conceptual analysis, two important relationships are explored: (1) The relationship between the MRTA and the hostages and (2) the relationship between the MRTA and the Peruvian government (including President Fujimori). Overall, the authors of this analysis found that the MRTA-hostage relationship was ultimately more favorable than the Fujimori-MRTA relationship.
关系发展理论视角下的1996-1997年秘鲁日本大使馆人质危机中的人际关系
本文将关系发展理论应用于1996年12月至1997年4月发生在秘鲁利马的日本大使馆人质危机。在人质危机中,秘鲁恐怖组织“Túpac阿马鲁革命运动”(MRTA)成员袭击了日本驻利马大使馆,劫持了数百名人质。他们向秘鲁政府提出要求,以换取人质的安全。这个理论是由马克·l·纳普提出的,它描述了相互作用——例如:夫妻、谈判者等等,都要经历关系的各个阶段,以加强他们的人际沟通或社会联系。在这个概念分析中,探讨了两个重要的关系:(1)MRTA与人质之间的关系;(2)MRTA与秘鲁政府(包括藤森总统)之间的关系。总的来说,本分析的作者发现mrta -人质关系最终比藤森- mrta关系更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Security Research
Journal of Applied Security Research CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信