Pyloromyotomy in Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Comparative Study Between Supraumbilical Curved Skin Incision and Standard (Right Upper Quadrant) Skin Incision: Study in a Resource Limited Setting

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
M. Peyvasteh, S. Askarpour, Mahmood Khoshkhabar, H. Javaherizadeh
{"title":"Pyloromyotomy in Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Comparative Study Between Supraumbilical Curved Skin Incision and Standard (Right Upper Quadrant) Skin Incision: Study in a Resource Limited Setting","authors":"M. Peyvasteh, S. Askarpour, Mahmood Khoshkhabar, H. Javaherizadeh","doi":"10.2147/oas.s262825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The main therapeutic option for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is pyloromyotomy surgical technique which can be performed via different methods, including right upper quadrant (RUQ) transverse incision and supraumbilical curved skin incision; thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical efficacy of supraumbilical curved skin incision and standard (RUQ) skin incision. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 35 patients with HPS were initially evaluated. After evaluating hospital records, 31 patients with completed hospital records were included: 9 from case group and 22 from control group. Demographic information, surgery parameters and postoperative complications were extracted from the hospital records or calling parents. Results: Results showed that the surgery parameters such as surgery duration (P=0.211), postoperative fasting duration (P=0.831), and hospitalization duration (P=0.521) in both groups were similar. Moreover, surgery complications such as duodenal or gastric perforation and surgical site infection did not differ between the groups (P>0.05). While we found that Vancouver Scar Scale was significantly lower in supraumbilical curved skin incision as compared to control group (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 5.1 ± 0.7, P<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study showed the beneficial effects of supraumbilical curved skin incision technique on surgery scar outcomes and gives best cosmetic results with minimal complications, which could be replaced to RUQ operative technique and significantly lead to better control of surgery scar.","PeriodicalId":56363,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/oas.s262825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The main therapeutic option for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is pyloromyotomy surgical technique which can be performed via different methods, including right upper quadrant (RUQ) transverse incision and supraumbilical curved skin incision; thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical efficacy of supraumbilical curved skin incision and standard (RUQ) skin incision. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 35 patients with HPS were initially evaluated. After evaluating hospital records, 31 patients with completed hospital records were included: 9 from case group and 22 from control group. Demographic information, surgery parameters and postoperative complications were extracted from the hospital records or calling parents. Results: Results showed that the surgery parameters such as surgery duration (P=0.211), postoperative fasting duration (P=0.831), and hospitalization duration (P=0.521) in both groups were similar. Moreover, surgery complications such as duodenal or gastric perforation and surgical site infection did not differ between the groups (P>0.05). While we found that Vancouver Scar Scale was significantly lower in supraumbilical curved skin incision as compared to control group (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 5.1 ± 0.7, P<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study showed the beneficial effects of supraumbilical curved skin incision technique on surgery scar outcomes and gives best cosmetic results with minimal complications, which could be replaced to RUQ operative technique and significantly lead to better control of surgery scar.
幽门狭窄的幽门切开术:创伤上弯曲皮肤切口和标准(右上象限)皮肤切口的比较研究:在资源有限的情况下进行的研究
背景:肥厚性幽门狭窄(HPS)的主要治疗选择是幽门肌切开术,可以通过不同的方法进行,包括右上象限(RUQ)横向切口和脐上弯曲皮肤切口;因此,本研究的目的是评估和比较脐上弯曲皮肤切口和标准(RUQ)皮肤切口的临床疗效。材料和方法:在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,对35例HPS患者进行了初步评估。在评估医院记录后,31名有完整医院记录的患者被纳入:病例组9名,对照组22名。从医院记录或致电父母中提取人口统计学信息、手术参数和术后并发症。结果:两组的手术时间(P=0.211)、术后禁食时间(P=0.831)和住院时间(P=0.521)等手术参数相似。此外,十二指肠或胃穿孔和手术部位感染等手术并发症在两组之间没有差异(P>0.05)。同时,我们发现脐上弯曲皮肤切口的Vancouver Scar量表明显低于对照组(分别为1.8±0.5和5.1±0.7,P<0.001)。结论:本研究结果表明,脐上弯曲皮肤切口技术对手术瘢痕效果有利,美容效果最好,并发症最小,可替代RUQ手术技术,显著控制手术瘢痕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Access Surgery is an international, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that focuses on all aspects of surgical procedures and interventions. Patient care around the peri-operative period and patient outcomes post surgery are key topics for the journal. All grades of surgery from minor cosmetic interventions to major surgical procedures will be covered. Novel techniques and the utilization of new instruments and materials, including implants and prostheses that optimize outcomes constitute major areas of interest. Contributions regarding patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, and their role in optimizing new surgical procedures will be welcomed. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of case reports, clinical studies, reviews and original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信