Is the ILO’s governance system fit for the 21st century?

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Global Social Policy Pub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI:10.1177/14680181221094952

Cindy Berman

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moral outrage often follows news stories exposing egregious abuse of workers, but it does not result in the actions needed to address it. Sadly, it feels like a perpetual game of whack-a-mole. I will argue, giving three examples from my own professional experience, that we need a new governance system regulating the world of work. The International Labour Organization (ILO) is the right institution, but often has the wrong actors around the negotiating table who can fix the endemic labour abuse that characterises our global economic system today.

查看原文本刊更多论文

国际劳工组织的治理体系适合21世纪吗？

道德愤怒通常发生在揭露严重虐待工人的新闻报道之后，但这并没有导致解决这一问题所需的行动。可悲的是，这感觉像是一场永远的打地鼠游戏。我将根据我自己的专业经验举三个例子，认为我们需要一个新的治理体系来规范工作世界。国际劳工组织（ILO）是正确的机构，但谈判桌上往往有错误的行为者，他们可以解决当今全球经济体系中普遍存在的劳动力滥用问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Global Social Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Global Social Policy is a fully peer-reviewed journal that advances the understanding of the impact of globalisation processes upon social policy and social development on the one hand, and the impact of social policy upon globalisation processes on the other hand. The journal analyses the contributions of a range of national and international actors, both governmental and non-governmental, to global social policy and social development discourse and practice. Global Social Policy publishes scholarly policy-oriented articles and reports that focus on aspects of social policy and social and human development as broadly defined in the context of globalisation be it in contemporary or historical contexts.