PERSIDANGAN ELEKTRONIK (E-LITIGASI) PADA PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA

Agus Salim, Elfran Bima Muttaqin
{"title":"PERSIDANGAN ELEKTRONIK (E-LITIGASI) PADA PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA","authors":"Agus Salim, Elfran Bima Muttaqin","doi":"10.51342/PLJ.V2I1.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The State Administrative Judicial as the executor of judicial power has a duty and authority to examine, decide, and resolve State Administrative disputes. Along with tecnological development, judicial practices within the scope of the Indonesian Supreme Court hal implemented the ecourt application.  The aims of this study is to analyze policies regarding the implementation of Electronic Litigation in the State Administrative Judicial, as well as to find the obstacles encountered. This study uses a normative method with a statute approach, that is Act 5 in 1986 concerning State Administrative Judicial and its amendment, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 concerning Administration of Cases and Trials in Court Electonically. The result of the study show that the application of Electronic Litigation at State Administrative Judicial is carried out comprehensively, that is from the registration stage until reading of judicial decisions. The obstacles that still being faced are related to the stage of evidence which in practice still requires a conventional trial, and the limited access to the internet network in several regions in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":82303,"journal":{"name":"Philippine law journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"15-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51342/PLJ.V2I1.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The State Administrative Judicial as the executor of judicial power has a duty and authority to examine, decide, and resolve State Administrative disputes. Along with tecnological development, judicial practices within the scope of the Indonesian Supreme Court hal implemented the ecourt application.  The aims of this study is to analyze policies regarding the implementation of Electronic Litigation in the State Administrative Judicial, as well as to find the obstacles encountered. This study uses a normative method with a statute approach, that is Act 5 in 1986 concerning State Administrative Judicial and its amendment, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 concerning Administration of Cases and Trials in Court Electonically. The result of the study show that the application of Electronic Litigation at State Administrative Judicial is carried out comprehensively, that is from the registration stage until reading of judicial decisions. The obstacles that still being faced are related to the stage of evidence which in practice still requires a conventional trial, and the limited access to the internet network in several regions in Indonesia.
电子运输
国家行政司法人员作为司法权的执行者,有审查、裁决和解决国家行政争议的职责和权限。随着技术的发展,印尼最高法院范围内的司法实践已经实施了生态法庭申请。本研究的目的是分析国家行政司法部门实施电子诉讼的政策,并找出所遇到的障碍。本研究采用了规范方法和法规方法,即1986年关于国家行政司法及其修正案的第5号法案,以及2019年关于法院选举管理案件和审判的最高法院第1号条例。研究结果表明,电子诉讼在国家行政司法机关的适用是全面的,即从登记阶段到宣读司法裁决。仍然面临的障碍与证据阶段有关,在实践中仍然需要常规审判,以及印度尼西亚几个地区的互联网接入有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信