The Neo-Documentarian Manifesto: A Critical Reading

IF 0.6 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Konrad Schmid
{"title":"The Neo-Documentarian Manifesto: A Critical Reading","authors":"Konrad Schmid","doi":"10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In the recent past, Wellhausen's classic Documentary Hypothesis has been developed and refined by a group of scholars who identify as \"Neo-Documentarians.\" Their approach has been aptly described in a list of seven points published by both Joel S. Baden and Jeffrey Stackert. This list is labeled the \"Neo-Documentarian Manifesto\" here and will be critically discussed. The evaluation will particularly highlight the methodological separation between literary and historical perspectives and the notion of a mechanical compiler.","PeriodicalId":15251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Literature","volume":"140 1","pages":"461 - 479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In the recent past, Wellhausen's classic Documentary Hypothesis has been developed and refined by a group of scholars who identify as "Neo-Documentarians." Their approach has been aptly described in a list of seven points published by both Joel S. Baden and Jeffrey Stackert. This list is labeled the "Neo-Documentarian Manifesto" here and will be critically discussed. The evaluation will particularly highlight the methodological separation between literary and historical perspectives and the notion of a mechanical compiler.
新纪实主义宣言:批判性解读
摘要:在最近的一段时间里,韦尔豪森的经典文献假说是由一群被称为“新文献主义者”的学者发展和完善的。他们的方法在乔尔·s·巴登和杰弗里·斯塔克发表的一份七点清单中得到了恰当的描述。这份名单在这里被称为“新纪录片宣言”,将被批判性地讨论。评估将特别强调文学和历史视角之间的方法分离以及机械编译器的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信