High School Students' Comprehension of Kinematics Graphs wıth Peer Instruction Approach

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
T. Gok, O. Gok
{"title":"High School Students' Comprehension of Kinematics Graphs wıth Peer Instruction Approach","authors":"T. Gok, O. Gok","doi":"10.15294/jpfi.v18i2.35028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigated the effects of the peer instruction approach on high school students' kinematics graphs interpretation skills and understanding of kinematics graphs. The study was conducted with 65 high school students from two groups. The first group was the experimental group and the second group was the control group. 32 students of the experimental group were taught using the peer instruction approach while 33 students of the control group were taught using the conventional teaching method. The data of the study were collected with the Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics. The results of the study showed that the peer instruction approach had a more positive effect on students' kinematics graphs interpretation skills and understanding of kinematic graphs than the conventional teaching method. In addition, there was a reasonable change in students' understanding of graphs and graphical thinking processes in the experimental group The students' understanding of graphs and graphical thinking processes did not change significantly in the control group. The results of the study revealed that the peer instruction approach can be used with little effort to assess and improve high school students' academic achievement in physics classes.","PeriodicalId":42020,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia-Indonesian Journal of Physics Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia-Indonesian Journal of Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v18i2.35028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of the peer instruction approach on high school students' kinematics graphs interpretation skills and understanding of kinematics graphs. The study was conducted with 65 high school students from two groups. The first group was the experimental group and the second group was the control group. 32 students of the experimental group were taught using the peer instruction approach while 33 students of the control group were taught using the conventional teaching method. The data of the study were collected with the Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics. The results of the study showed that the peer instruction approach had a more positive effect on students' kinematics graphs interpretation skills and understanding of kinematic graphs than the conventional teaching method. In addition, there was a reasonable change in students' understanding of graphs and graphical thinking processes in the experimental group The students' understanding of graphs and graphical thinking processes did not change significantly in the control group. The results of the study revealed that the peer instruction approach can be used with little effort to assess and improve high school students' academic achievement in physics classes.
中学生对运动学图形的理解wıth同伴指导法
本研究调查了同伴教学方法对高中生运动学图解释技能和运动学图理解的影响。这项研究是对来自两组的65名高中生进行的。第一组为实验组,第二组为对照组。实验组32名学生采用同伴教学法,对照组33名学生采用常规教学法。这项研究的数据是通过运动学中的图形理解测试收集的。研究结果表明,与传统教学方法相比,同伴教学方法对学生的运动学图形解释技能和对运动学图形的理解有更积极的影响。此外,实验组学生对图形和图形思维过程的理解发生了合理的变化。对照组学生对图和图形思维进程的理解没有显著变化。研究结果表明,同伴教学法可以毫不费力地评估和提高高中生在物理课上的学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信