The Use of Task Clarification and Self-Monitoring to Increase Affirmative to Constructive Feedback Ratios in Supervisory Relationships

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Anna Schulz, David A. Wilder
{"title":"The Use of Task Clarification and Self-Monitoring to Increase Affirmative to Constructive Feedback Ratios in Supervisory Relationships","authors":"Anna Schulz, David A. Wilder","doi":"10.1080/01608061.2021.2019168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Previous research has demonstrated that a minimum ratio of 5 affirmative to 1 constructive interactions is correlated with successful long-term intimate relationships, and similar (i.e., 4:1) ratios have been suggested in the context of supervisory relationships in employment settings. However, research has yet to examine methods of increasing interactional ratios to achieve such levels. In the current study, we analyzed the effects of task clarification and, if necessary, self-monitoring on ratios of affirmative to constructive feedback statements made by three supervisors of direct care staff during in-situ supervision at an early intensive behavioral intervention clinic. Results show that two supervisors achieved the criterion for ratios of affirmative to constructive statements with task clarification, while the third participant required self-monitoring to achieve the criterion. A social validity measure indicated that both supervisors and direct care staff members approved of the procedures and the outcome of the study.","PeriodicalId":51667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2021.2019168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Previous research has demonstrated that a minimum ratio of 5 affirmative to 1 constructive interactions is correlated with successful long-term intimate relationships, and similar (i.e., 4:1) ratios have been suggested in the context of supervisory relationships in employment settings. However, research has yet to examine methods of increasing interactional ratios to achieve such levels. In the current study, we analyzed the effects of task clarification and, if necessary, self-monitoring on ratios of affirmative to constructive feedback statements made by three supervisors of direct care staff during in-situ supervision at an early intensive behavioral intervention clinic. Results show that two supervisors achieved the criterion for ratios of affirmative to constructive statements with task clarification, while the third participant required self-monitoring to achieve the criterion. A social validity measure indicated that both supervisors and direct care staff members approved of the procedures and the outcome of the study.
利用任务澄清和自我监控提高监督关系中肯定-建构反馈比率
摘要先前的研究表明,5次肯定与1次建设性互动的最低比例与成功的长期亲密关系相关,在就业环境中的监督关系中也提出了类似的比例(即4:1)。然而,研究尚未检验提高互动比率以达到这一水平的方法。在目前的研究中,我们分析了任务澄清和自我监督(如有必要)对直接护理人员的三名主管在早期强化行为干预诊所的现场监督期间所做的肯定与建设性反馈陈述的比例的影响。结果表明,两名主管在任务澄清的情况下达到了肯定性陈述与建设性陈述的比例标准,而第三名参与者需要自我监督才能达到标准。社会有效性测量表明,主管和直接护理人员都认可研究的程序和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
47.60%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior Management—the official journal of the OBM Network (www.obmnetwork.com)—is a periodical devoted specifically to scientific principles to improve organizational performance through behavioral change. The journal publishes research and review articles, reports from the field, discussions, and book reviews on the topics that are critical to today"s organization development practitioners, operations managers, and human resource professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信