Advantages and disadvantages of the use of Xenopus laevis embryos and zebra fish as alternative methods to assess teratogens

IF 6.1 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Elena Menegola , Maria Battistoni , Francesca Metruccio , Francesca Di Renzo
{"title":"Advantages and disadvantages of the use of Xenopus laevis embryos and zebra fish as alternative methods to assess teratogens","authors":"Elena Menegola ,&nbsp;Maria Battistoni ,&nbsp;Francesca Metruccio ,&nbsp;Francesca Di Renzo","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2023.100387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traditional teratological protocols in mammals are mandatory for pharmaceutical and chemical product registration, but require hundreds of animals and are complex and money/time-consuming. Among alternative methods, low vertebrate (the teleost zebrafish and the amphibian <span><em>Xenopus</em></span>) whole embryo developmental toxicological tests appear evolutionary closer to humans than invertebrates and produce more useful data for human health extrapolation. At least during early stages, in fact, all vertebrate embryos share, from both morphological and molecular point of view, developmental pathways. By consequence similar toxicological responses of embryos to toxicant are expected. Advantages and disadvantages of these two alternative whole organism tests are briefly reviewed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100387"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202023000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Traditional teratological protocols in mammals are mandatory for pharmaceutical and chemical product registration, but require hundreds of animals and are complex and money/time-consuming. Among alternative methods, low vertebrate (the teleost zebrafish and the amphibian Xenopus) whole embryo developmental toxicological tests appear evolutionary closer to humans than invertebrates and produce more useful data for human health extrapolation. At least during early stages, in fact, all vertebrate embryos share, from both morphological and molecular point of view, developmental pathways. By consequence similar toxicological responses of embryos to toxicant are expected. Advantages and disadvantages of these two alternative whole organism tests are briefly reviewed.

使用非洲爪蟾胚胎和斑马鱼作为评估致畸物的替代方法的优缺点
传统的哺乳动物致畸方案是药物和化学产品注册的强制性规定,但需要数百只动物,而且复杂且金钱/耗时。在替代方法中,低脊椎动物(硬骨鱼斑马鱼和两栖动物爪蟾)的全胚胎发育毒理学测试似乎比无脊椎动物更接近人类进化,并为人类健康推断提供更有用的数据。至少在早期阶段,事实上,所有的脊椎动物胚胎,从形态和分子的角度来看,都有共同的发育途径。因此,预计胚胎对毒物也会有类似的毒理学反应。简要回顾了这两种替代的全生物试验的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Current Opinion in Toxicology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信