Eliminating zombie companies through insolvency law in China: striking a balance between market-oriented policies and government intervention

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Jingchen Zhao, S. Wen, R. Parry, Chuyi Wei
{"title":"Eliminating zombie companies through insolvency law in China: striking a balance between market-oriented policies and government intervention","authors":"Jingchen Zhao, S. Wen, R. Parry, Chuyi Wei","doi":"10.1080/10192557.2022.2033083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Zombie companies emerged in China for economic and social reasons, particularly as a result of earlier expansionary economic policies. Having been kept alive through subsidies for social and political reasons more recently zombie companies have been the target of ambitious elimination policies in China. Local governments have been given targets for zombie company elimination and there have been significant achievements in zombie market exits. Yet an examination of case law reveals limited usage of insolvency laws in the processes used and this is unsurprising given the nascent state of insolvency law and supporting institutions necessitating administrative approaches. In recognising existing limitations this paper advocates the development of a hybrid approach towards zombie company elimination, using market based exit approaches while recognising that administrative approaches are needed to provide social services and an enabling environment for these cases. Using a steel industry case study it considers how a greater role for creditors and independent administrators can aid in market based approaches, as well as improvements to judicial and court capacity to handle insolvency cases.","PeriodicalId":42799,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Law Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"264 - 286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2033083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Zombie companies emerged in China for economic and social reasons, particularly as a result of earlier expansionary economic policies. Having been kept alive through subsidies for social and political reasons more recently zombie companies have been the target of ambitious elimination policies in China. Local governments have been given targets for zombie company elimination and there have been significant achievements in zombie market exits. Yet an examination of case law reveals limited usage of insolvency laws in the processes used and this is unsurprising given the nascent state of insolvency law and supporting institutions necessitating administrative approaches. In recognising existing limitations this paper advocates the development of a hybrid approach towards zombie company elimination, using market based exit approaches while recognising that administrative approaches are needed to provide social services and an enabling environment for these cases. Using a steel industry case study it considers how a greater role for creditors and independent administrators can aid in market based approaches, as well as improvements to judicial and court capacity to handle insolvency cases.
中国通过破产法消灭僵尸公司:在市场化政策和政府干预之间取得平衡
摘要中国出现僵尸企业是出于经济和社会原因,特别是早期扩张性经济政策的结果。由于社会和政治原因,僵尸企业通过补贴得以生存,最近成为中国雄心勃勃的淘汰政策的目标。地方政府已经制定了消灭僵尸企业的目标,在僵尸市场退出方面取得了重大成就。然而,对判例法的审查显示,在所使用的程序中,破产法的使用有限,考虑到破产法的新生状态和需要采取行政方法的支持机构,这并不奇怪。在认识到现有局限性的同时,本文主张开发一种混合方法来消除僵尸公司,使用基于市场的退出方法,同时认识到需要行政方法来为这些情况提供社会服务和有利的环境。通过对钢铁行业的案例研究,它考虑了债权人和独立管理人如何发挥更大的作用,帮助采取基于市场的方法,以及提高司法和法院处理破产案件的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信