Is hyacinth exercise better than pelvic floor exercise alone for urinary incontinence: A randomized trial

Q4 Medicine
Maherah Kamarudin, J. Hong, Yogeeta Gunasagran, Chua Shiao Chuan, N. A. Razif, S. Khong, M. Tan
{"title":"Is hyacinth exercise better than pelvic floor exercise alone for urinary incontinence: A randomized trial","authors":"Maherah Kamarudin, J. Hong, Yogeeta Gunasagran, Chua Shiao Chuan, N. A. Razif, S. Khong, M. Tan","doi":"10.4081/uij.2021.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urinary Incontinence (UI) negatively impact women’s physical, psychological and health-related quality of life. Pelvic strengthening exercise is the first line management in UI. We hypothesized that Hyacinth exercise is better than Pelvic Floor Exercise (PFE) in strengthening pelvic floor muscles, thus reducing female urinary incontinence. This randomized controlled trial involved 180 women with UI. Participants were taught on either Hyacinth exercise or PFE alone. Improvement in urinary symptoms and pelvic muscle strength were evaluated using a validated female pelvic floor questionnaire and objectively measured at 2 months and 6 months. Significant improvement in urinary symptoms and pelvic muscle strength post treatment at 2 months and 6 months was seen in both groups with p≤0.001. Although earlier improvement seen in Hyacinth group, it did not reach level of significant when compared, between the two exercises. Mean bladder score (PFE vs Hyacinth arm) 9.13±6.54 vs. 8.74±5.21, p=0.93 (2 months) and 5.80±4.15 vs. 5.79±4.22, p=0.92 (6 months). Although there was no statistical difference between the two groups for our primary and secondary outcomes, Hyacinth group demonstrated earlier improvement in urinary symptoms at 2 months.","PeriodicalId":35651,"journal":{"name":"Urogynaecologia International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynaecologia International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/uij.2021.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urinary Incontinence (UI) negatively impact women’s physical, psychological and health-related quality of life. Pelvic strengthening exercise is the first line management in UI. We hypothesized that Hyacinth exercise is better than Pelvic Floor Exercise (PFE) in strengthening pelvic floor muscles, thus reducing female urinary incontinence. This randomized controlled trial involved 180 women with UI. Participants were taught on either Hyacinth exercise or PFE alone. Improvement in urinary symptoms and pelvic muscle strength were evaluated using a validated female pelvic floor questionnaire and objectively measured at 2 months and 6 months. Significant improvement in urinary symptoms and pelvic muscle strength post treatment at 2 months and 6 months was seen in both groups with p≤0.001. Although earlier improvement seen in Hyacinth group, it did not reach level of significant when compared, between the two exercises. Mean bladder score (PFE vs Hyacinth arm) 9.13±6.54 vs. 8.74±5.21, p=0.93 (2 months) and 5.80±4.15 vs. 5.79±4.22, p=0.92 (6 months). Although there was no statistical difference between the two groups for our primary and secondary outcomes, Hyacinth group demonstrated earlier improvement in urinary symptoms at 2 months.
风信子运动比盆底运动单独治疗尿失禁更好:一项随机试验
尿失禁(UI)对女性的身体、心理和健康相关的生活质量产生负面影响。骨盆强化运动是UI的一线管理。我们假设风信子运动在增强盆底肌肉方面比盆底运动(PFE)更好,从而减少女性尿失禁。这项随机对照试验涉及180名UI女性。参与者接受风信子运动或PFE单独训练。使用经验证的女性盆底问卷评估尿液症状和骨盆肌肉力量的改善,并在2个月和6个月时进行客观测量。治疗后2个月和6个月,两组的泌尿系统症状和骨盆肌肉力量均有显著改善,p≤0.001。尽管风信子组早期出现了改善,但在两次锻炼之间进行比较时,并没有达到显著水平。平均膀胱评分(PFE vs风信子组)9.13±6.54 vs.8.74±5.21,p=0.93(2个月)和5.80±4.15 vs.5.79±4.22,p=0.92(6个月)。尽管两组的主要和次要结果没有统计学差异,但风信子组在2个月时尿路症状得到了早期改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urogynaecologia International Journal
Urogynaecologia International Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信