An Equity Analysis of Applying for Welfare: TANF Application and Denial Reasons by Household and County Characteristics

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Andrea Hetling, Stephanie Holcomb, D. Seith, A. Riordan, Juan Santiago, Jessica L. Roman, Stephanie Lupinacci, Amman Seehra
{"title":"An Equity Analysis of Applying for Welfare: TANF Application and Denial Reasons by Household and County Characteristics","authors":"Andrea Hetling, Stephanie Holcomb, D. Seith, A. Riordan, Juan Santiago, Jessica L. Roman, Stephanie Lupinacci, Amman Seehra","doi":"10.1086/717298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of families receiving public cash assistance has decreased since welfare reform and the establishment of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) in 1996, with only a few short-lived increases. The early decline was related to caseload exits; the recent decline is attributed to fewer eligible families participating. Using New Jersey TANF data from 2018, we conduct an equity analysis of TANF applications, denials, and the reasons for such denials. Multilevel and multinomial models examine risk factors that may impede access by identity or geography. Findings reveal statistically significant relationships between household characteristics and application outcomes, but no county-level variables were significant. Applicants with prior TANF receipt were less likely to be denied. Noncitizens, applicants with prior sanctions, and those over the TANF time limit were more likely to be denied. We discuss differences in access by race and ethnicity, along with policy implications, in the context of need.","PeriodicalId":47665,"journal":{"name":"Social Service Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Service Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The number of families receiving public cash assistance has decreased since welfare reform and the establishment of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) in 1996, with only a few short-lived increases. The early decline was related to caseload exits; the recent decline is attributed to fewer eligible families participating. Using New Jersey TANF data from 2018, we conduct an equity analysis of TANF applications, denials, and the reasons for such denials. Multilevel and multinomial models examine risk factors that may impede access by identity or geography. Findings reveal statistically significant relationships between household characteristics and application outcomes, but no county-level variables were significant. Applicants with prior TANF receipt were less likely to be denied. Noncitizens, applicants with prior sanctions, and those over the TANF time limit were more likely to be denied. We discuss differences in access by race and ethnicity, along with policy implications, in the context of need.
福利申请的公平性分析:TANF申请与拒绝原因的户县特征
自1996年福利改革和建立贫困家庭临时援助以来,接受公共现金援助的家庭数量有所减少,只有几次短暂的增长。早期的下降与案件数量的退出有关;最近的下降归因于参与的符合条件的家庭减少。利用2018年新泽西州TANF的数据,我们对TANF的申请、拒绝以及拒绝的原因进行了公平分析。多层次和多项模型通过身份或地理位置来检查可能阻碍访问的风险因素。研究结果显示,家庭特征和应用结果之间存在统计学上显著的关系,但没有县级变量具有显著性。之前收到TANF的申请人被拒绝的可能性较小。非公民、先前受到制裁的申请人以及超过TANF时限的申请人更有可能被拒绝。我们在需要的背景下讨论了按种族和族裔划分的准入差异,以及政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Service Review
Social Service Review SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1927, Social Service Review is devoted to the publication of thought-provoking, original research on social welfare policy, organization, and practice. Articles in the Review analyze issues from the points of view of various disciplines, theories, and methodological traditions, view critical problems in context, and carefully consider long-range solutions. The Review features balanced, scholarly contributions from social work and social welfare scholars, as well as from members of the various allied disciplines engaged in research on human behavior, social systems, history, public policy, and social services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信