Metropolitan tier of government to facilitate a bottom-up two-tier metropolitan governance model in Melbourne, Australia

IF 1.2 Q2 Social Sciences
Natalia Bliznina
{"title":"Metropolitan tier of government to facilitate a bottom-up two-tier metropolitan governance model in Melbourne, Australia","authors":"Natalia Bliznina","doi":"10.1080/07293682.2020.1775667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article compares government tiers, governance models, and strategic planning policies applying to metropolitan Vancouver and Melbourne. The method of comparison was chosen to reveal gaps in policies to assess the potential for improving the governance model for metropolitan Melbourne. The regional or metropolitan tier of government is absent in Australia. This deficit causes the absence of institutional frameworks and policy delivery tools at the metropolitan level – the metropolitan governance deficit. The establishing of the additional fourth tier of government could be effective to address the implementation deficit in Melbourne. This paper reviews the bottom-up two-tier metropolitan governance model and how it could impact positively on the infrastructure delivery using the Strategic Plan as a planning tool.","PeriodicalId":45599,"journal":{"name":"Australian Planner","volume":"56 1","pages":"206 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07293682.2020.1775667","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Planner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2020.1775667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article compares government tiers, governance models, and strategic planning policies applying to metropolitan Vancouver and Melbourne. The method of comparison was chosen to reveal gaps in policies to assess the potential for improving the governance model for metropolitan Melbourne. The regional or metropolitan tier of government is absent in Australia. This deficit causes the absence of institutional frameworks and policy delivery tools at the metropolitan level – the metropolitan governance deficit. The establishing of the additional fourth tier of government could be effective to address the implementation deficit in Melbourne. This paper reviews the bottom-up two-tier metropolitan governance model and how it could impact positively on the infrastructure delivery using the Strategic Plan as a planning tool.
在澳大利亚墨尔本建立自下而上的双层城市治理模式
本文比较了大温哥华和墨尔本的政府层级、治理模式和战略规划政策。选择比较的方法是为了揭示政策差距,以评估改善大都市墨尔本治理模式的潜力。澳大利亚没有地区或城市一级政府。这一赤字导致大都市一级缺乏制度框架和政策执行工具,即大都市治理赤字。建立额外的第四层政府可以有效地解决墨尔本的执行赤字。本文回顾了自下而上的两层城市治理模式,以及该模式如何利用《战略规划》作为规划工具对基础设施交付产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Planner
Australian Planner REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信